Sunday, June 12, 2016

Trump University Business Marketing Master Strategist Turns His Deft Slight-of-Hand Magic Business Tricks to Politricks and Political Marketing and Shifting Public Attention from His Dirty Dealings

Attention Shifting of the American Public Away from His Scandals by Donald Trump and His Strategy Team  

(This blog is under reconstruction, as it has been tampered with in which another of my blog posts was substituted for it, which I have replaced with this proper but incomplete reconstruction of the proper post) 

Trump University Business Marketing Master Strategist Donald Trump Turns His Slick Slight-of-Hand Business Magic Tricks to Politricks and Political Marketing and Attention Shifting of the American Public Away from the Scandals of His Fraudulent Trump University, History of Absconding on His Bills and Creditors, Public Bigotry and Demagoguery, Abruptly Reincarnating and Rebranding His Unsavory Swindler and Demagogic Real Life Persona of Worldwide Notoriety into a Wink-and-Nod, Hoodwink-and-Fraud Political Campaign Image of This-is-the-Real Me:  Mr. Clean Good-Guy Nice-Guy.

Now he turns, with help or helpers, to changing the subject on a new, belatedly exposed  sex scandal, in which he was the self-identified sex predator, revealed and publicized in October of 2016, in serial sex assault and harassment, to which he confessed in a self-incriminating publicly broadcast audio-video recording, in which he bragged about groping the genitalia of women, kissing them and ogling them in a state of undressed or while dressing in their dressing room, dressing rooms for models, models who identified themselves as having been underage teen girl models when he intruded into their dressing rooms and ogled them.

What to Expect of Donald Trump in His Major News Media Conference Speech of 06-13-2016 (the part of his speech to focus on Hillary Clinton has been postponed in light of the mass killing and woundings in Orlando Florida on Sunday, 06-12-2016) Redirecting Public Attention from His Scandals Pervading the Mainstream News to His Smear Campaign of the Character of former US Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, His Democratic Party election candidate opponent in the 2016 general election for the US presidency

Trump’s announced, but postponed, major media news conference and speech on Hillary Clinton will be an infomercial character-assassination smear campaign against Hillary Clinton based on a go-get-it hyped oppositional [research, besmirch] torch and destroy political-partisan propaganda warfare book, as well as be a promotion for the money, money, money sales of the book, in hoped for reward of the mercenary author, for that let’s-get-it-on money,  big-money payday, via Amazon dot com, and other book outlet, sales!

07-29-2016:  Two political bomber-smear books are out,  one by literal whoremonger, political strategist adviser and rightwinger smear author Dick Morris, publicly outed by a politically and socially virtuous prostitute, and the other by a retired federal Secret Service employee.  I will not potentially help in stimulating sales of their books by identifying their titles, until after election day, on November 08, 2016, at which time the books will be irrelevant and essentially unsalable.     

While verbally whitewashing his tawdry, crazy-man image, for the moment, in contrasting action, true to his everyday, normal self as a flamboyant but shaky and shady businessman with a history as a crook in his business dealings and the real crook in comparison to his campaign opponent Hillary Clinton, the duplicitous trash-talking, garbage-mouthed Donald Trump goes on the offensive with the traditional, of late, GOP arsenal of trite political pseudo-news, political propaganda warfare weapons of no-truth or grain-of-truth smear campaign of infomercial disinformation, misinformation and slanderous allegations, books and movies deployed for public character assassination of the opponents of GOP candidates for elective government office.  These unscrupulous power-politics smear campaigns are based on the principle and strategy that “It does not matter ‘what’ is true (or the degree of trueness or the context of the ‘what’ assertion/s)!” – “It only matters what people believe to be true (or, by absence, distortion or misconstrual of facts, what they are led to believe to be true)!,” “in the service of winning, by hood or crook!,” like the false claimed foreign birth of President Obama in the 2008 GOP-partisan talk-show and commentator pseudo-news media, also reported and argued in a 2008 book written by a Ph.D. GOP partisan who was expelled from Kenya for his lifetime for trying to recruit President Obama’s rural villager, poor maternal grandmother there to give spoken testimonial support for his proven false charge; like the 2012 anti-Obama propaganda pseudo-documentary made by a Republican US citizen of East Indian heritage who in promotion of the movie was flanked by white men, to my sense the likes of GOP Ku Klux Klansmen in suits hustling a servile, very brown-skinned, equivalent of a supplicant Uncle Tom, front man to do their dirty work and by the overt gesture of this image for them to disclaim racism on their part as a motive for the propaganda pseudo-documentary (the truth is that India has a widespread and recalcitrant culture of extreme bias based on caste, class and gender, and even haphazardly based on skin complexion, as well as extreme bias generally toward black African visitors to India, including toward visibly well-to-do, better-off black Africans, as opposed to Arabic northern Africans, which black African visitors to India complain about as being blatant bias, disrespect and violence toward them, endemic prejudice and bias that Indian authorities acknowledge, condemn and publicly say they are working to remedy -- these being cultural attitudes and practices that may migrate elsewhere in some of those who migrate elsewhere, similar to white racism’s migration with European migration to and colonization of the Americas, Africa [worst in Dutch colonial Africa, South Africa and in Zimbabwe when it was Rhodesia], India, China, Indochina, Hawaii, Polynesia, Australia, New Zealand, etc.)

Former US Senator Max Clelland, Democrat of Georgia, a purple-heart medal awardee, double-amputee, Army veteran was unseated as a US senator by a vicious and false GOP political campaign falsely discrediting the merit of his decorated combat service by a GOP opponent without military service, and that candidate’s accomplices, as was done to John Kerry, but for Kerry the smear of his decorated military service was based on the political advertisement testimony of some of his malcontent subordinates, an political advertisement campaign against John Kerry financed by a fossil-fuels big-man, rightwing GOP Texas billionaire, with no military service.  Donald Trump himself, with no military service, is reviled by many military veterans and Republicans who are deeply offended by his dismissive remarks regarding the revered and decorated military service of his fellow Republican the Senator John McCain of Arizona, a purple-heart awardee veteran – while many people may dislike McCain’s military interventionist hawkishness as a US senator, they largely respect and commend him for his military service.  I’m so glad that veterans organizations complained about the overdue money Trump promised them, and then took the money when it finally came to them under news media pressure on Trump for this promise but did not endorse his candidacy in the election campaigns for the US president!

These disinformation, smear, propaganda weapons failed against President Obama in both of his presidential election bids of respectively 2008 and 2012 but succeeded against the presidential bids of Al Gore in 2000, based on mocking ads distorting his words and falsely claiming that he said he had invented the Internet , and unconscionably and despicably, in the Swift-Boat disinformation TV political commercial campaign against former US Senator John Kerry in 2004, now US Secretary of State John Kerry.

Since the outbreak in the mainstream news media in the first two weeks of this June of 2016 of the scandalous news of the Trump Universe fraud, other misdeeds of, complaints against and scandals prominently involving Trump have also found voicing in the mainstream mass media news, to the political dread and panic of Trump and his campaign team, including

Week of May 30, 2016

A flap with military veterans groups over $6,000,000 he pledged to them that were well overdue for receipt by them.  When the money was distributed to them it was short circa $400,000 of the pledged amount of which Trump himself contributed $1,000,000 with the other $4,600,000 having come from fund raising from the public.

Trump’s public ethnically bigoted excoriation of the federal judge hearing the trial of his fraudulent 
Trump University, condemning the judge’s ruling against Trump University as biased and illegitimate because the judge is “a Mexican,” where the judge was born and raised as a US citizen-resident in the state of Indiana, although he was of ancestral Mexican heritage.

Week of June 6, 2016 -- Attorneys General of Florida and Texas Outed as Hookers on the Sly and Using Their Government Offices as Whorehouses, selling their souls to Donald Trump, with a heart of cold, for a pittance and time bomb of poisonous money, now exploded.

State of Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi was revealed to have opted out of her state joining multistate attorneys' general class-action lawsuit against the multistate Trump University and affiliates fraud and swindle scam around the time she solicited a quid-pro-quo campaign contribution of $25,000 from Donald Trump for her reelection treasury chest, money that was remitted to her campaign fund indirectly via a Trump family foundation.  A group supporting Pam Bondi for reelection at the time reported to the organization ‘And Justice for All’ that it had received the $25,000.00 check on 09-17-2013, four days after state of Florida AG Pam Bondi announced that her office would not be joining the multistate attorneys’ general lawsuit against fraudulent Trump University, et. al. News credits go to the Orlando Sun Sentinel and Associated Press.

State of Texas former Attorney General Greg Abbott, now governor of Texas, was revealed to have shelved his state’s internal class-action lawsuit against the multistate Trump University fraud and swindle scam operations in Texas in exchange for Trump University promising to leave Texas despite the thoroughly investigated and prepared prosecution work of Trump University, et. al., by the Texas AG’s team of attorneys, with a settlement worth of $5,400,000.00, as of 2010. Several years later, Abbott is reported to have received a political election campaign contribution of $35,000 from Donald Trump, an apparent stealth quid pro quo for his quashing of the litigation against Trump University, et. al., in and for Texas and Texans ripped off by the Trump University fraud and swindle scam.  News credit goes to former Texas Deputy Chief AG John Owens.

Workweek ending 10-28-20016 -- An egregious politically partisan action of election influence by FBI Director James Comey, a Republican, Beneficial to Republican Party election candidates…

The 10-28-2016 politically strategically timed and announced cloud-of-innuendo high-publicity new investigation of Hillary Clinton by FBI Director James Comey, acting on his own, independently of the US Department of Justice and top FBI officials, is no sane reason to vote for a President Frankenstein monster, madman Donald Trump!

In contrasting federal institutional justice, during circa the summer of this year 2016, Donald Trump’s attorneys petitioned the federal judge presiding over the unlicensed, fraudulent, financial-rip off Trump University scandal class-action lawsuit to deny the release of any court, or litigation, testimony and evidence on this case and to postpone or suspend court proceedings on it until after the presidential election is over, so as to protect the political candidacy of Donald Trump from adverse information and publicity that might ensue from the trial on Trump University and Donald Trump’s relationship with and role in it. The judge agreed that release of testimony and evidence relating to the trial and the trial itself during the presidential election season could harm Donald Trump’s candidacy and he agreed to deny release of any information relating to the trial and to postpone or suspend the trial until after election day, 11-08-2016. This my recollection of the news articles I read and broadcasts I heard on the court petition to protect Donald Trump’s candidacy from its proceedings and the information obtained by the court on the Trump University law suit. Yet unsavory, sleazy, utterly crooked Donald Trump praises FBI Director Comey for his politically adverse publicity action against his political rival for the presidency Hillary Clinton and demagogues its cloud of innuendo, treating announce of the new investigation as meaning criminal culpability and guilty, and as a diversionary issue to silence his sexcapades scandal of accumulating claimed victim-witnesses, 13 at last count, dogging and damaging his campaign in the news media until arrival of this introduced new news media issue meant to impugn by suggestion, embarrass and undermine the presidential candidacy of Hillary Clinton -- an egocentric, egomaniacal, unscrupulous, flim-flam crazy man and hypocrite!

This politically strategically timed and announced new investigation by the FBI director against Hillary Clinton changes, and undoubtedly was meant to change, and may have indeed changed, the main political subject in the news media killing the viability of Donald Trump's presidential candidacy recently, a sexual predatory sex scandal with Trump the serial predator, a subject that was immolating the Trump candidacy and, by political fallout and contagion, those of other candidates for political office of the Republican Party and splitting the Republican Party into disunity and disarray:

In a news broadcast on 10-12-2016 of a women's protest rally of the lurid sexism and misogyny of Donald Trump, a rape-victim protester of Donald Trump as a misogynistic obscene lecher for his 1995 audio-video recorded comments in which he bragged about being a women's crotch grabber and having tried but failed to seduce a celebrity married woman named Nancy, revealed to be TV celebrity host Nancy O'Dell, remarked that not only is he disqualified for occupying the office of US presidency for his misogyny and disrespect for women, but that he is furthermore disqualified because these comments and his serially disrespectful remarks about all manner of other Americans reflect that he as a person lacks the basic "diplomacy," or diplomatic, skill and skills essential for any political leader and head of government.

(A major reason for why Republican Mike Pence lost in the vice-presidential-candidates debate of 10-04-2016 to Democrat Tim Kaine and Donald Trump lost again in the second presidential-candidates debate of 10-09-2016, in the judgment of the viewer public as opposed to that of political, politicized media pundits, is because both Tim Kaine and Hillary Clinton demonstrated themselves to be honest and honorable debaters in answering moderator and audience questions whereas both Pence and Trump came across in the debates as ducking or sidestepping questions and changing the subject [matter] under questioning, using their response time to deliver personalized political talking points and personal attacks, interrupting their opponent's rebuttals and talking over and drowning out their rebuttals until the response time for their opponent expired. That is, the latter engaged in flagrant, bullying, dishonorable cheating in the debates, demonstrating bad behavior and reflecting as well as evidencing abiding bad character and deficient integrity on their part, offending the moral sensibility of most viewers. Their ill-mannered and cheater debating tactics also offended most viewers’ standards and expectations of proper manners and fair play.

Incidentally, it is unsurprising that in the first, but possibly the second, Democratic versus Republican Party presidential-election-candidates debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump that when Trump was asked by the debate moderator how he would bring the former US manufacturing jobs off-shored to foreign nations back the US he sidestepped answering this question itself but replied instead that he would stop jobs from leaving the US without explaining how he would do this.

Though Donald Trump improved his debate manner, as opposed to the substance his arguments, in his third and final debate with Hillary Clinton on 10-19-2019, his impulse to incivility -- in interrupting Hillary Clinton during one of her turns to speak and, in short, calling her "nasty" and in his refusal at the end of the debate to offer to accept the results of the presidential election -- broke loose and blighted, soured and completely sabotaged, in the majority public opinion and mind, the otherwise largely respectable manner of his debate performance.)

Sexual abuse, assault and rape victims view Donald Trump's audio-video recorded depictions of his sexcapades associated with and against women and girls as casting him as a sewer rat wallowing and stewing in a sewer bath and view his theatrical public denials of some women and girls claiming that he visually intruded on them in their dressing rooms or physically imposed on their bodies sexually with his hands, kisses and his tongue as revealing him to be a drama-queen, emphatic liar con-artist.
 
Donald Trump’s public shouting tirades against the stream of claimed victim-witnesses of his lecherous hanky-panky, testifying that he behaved toward them as he described of himself to have and bragged he had in his own voice and words in an AV recording, denouncing and slurring them (the victim-witnesses) as all being liars and threatening to sue them after election day, 11-08-2016, was meant to intimidate them into silence and flight from airing their news-media validated and energized grievances against him, in which his AV-bragging, self-confessed guilt gave publicly objective support to the credibility, or validity, of their professed sexual victimization grievances against him. His dismissive, bashing and lawsuit threat and intimidation tirades also were meant to curb the growing number of additional potential victim-witnesses from publicly speaking out and reporting their sexual victimization by him, feeding the onslaught of bad publicity against his character and presidential campaign as well as decreasing customer patronage of his businesses.  In all, they were meant to mute them and make them and the sexual predator issue go away permanently, by means of, in this situation, checkmated, untenable legal-bluff intimidation on his part given that an actual legal confrontation with him by a claimed victim-witness or a multiplicity of victim-witnesses, especially in a class action lawsuit against him, in which he and his army of money-sucking lawyers, sucking on his stash, he would easily lose, in light of the publicly broadcast sexual predation self-confessed guilt AV recording of him in his voice and words,  to the professed victim-witness/es of his sexual assaults (non-consensual groping, kissing and otherwise amorous or sexual handling of them, as well as intruding into the dressing rooms of and ogling especially undressed or substantially or critically underage teen girl models, as he confessed on the AV recording to former TV show host Billy Bush and they (the alleged victim-witnesses) allege in the news media happened to themselves.  All they would have to do, at a minimum, is circumstantially show that they were in a same setting or environment with him (Trump) in which the victimization/s could have occurred to be immune from libel, whereas the burden of proof would be on him to show conclusively, in light of the publicly broadcast incriminating AV recording, that they were not in a same setting or environment in a same time frame  in which he could have sexually transgressed against them as, they have described, and he would have to demonstrate conclusively that they were liars as to their charges against him (impossible for Trump and his attorneys if the same setting or environment and time frame criteria concerning the alleged victim-witnesses can reasonably be supported, or, especially, verified).  Not only could these claimed victims, publicly slurred as liars by Trump and threatened with a lawsuit for allegedly lying, counter sue him and easily prevail in court were he to file suit against any or all of them for libel, they can immediately sue him, do thus now, given the said legal context, in which he has given them civilly legal cause-of-action, libel against them, for his public liar slur of and threat of a lawsuit against them for their allegations of sexual transgression by him against them.  The count of victim-witnesses was chilled to and stopped at 13, as of Trump’s threats to sue victim-witnesses.  By the way, radio and TV personality Howard Stern has reported that he has an AV recording of an interview he held on Donald Trump in which Trump again bragged about his sexcapades with women, but refuses to release it publicly because he views such a release to be a betrayal (source:  online entertainment culture site Forward, 10-18-2016).

Some question why the claimed victims are coming to news media and public attention with the public exposure and broadcasting of the audio-video (AV) recording in which Trump brags of his transgressive sexcapades. The answer, friends, is that the AV is braggadocio-volunteered testimonial evidence on the part of a self-reported perpetrator supporting their long-harbored grievances and grudge against him for his hands-on, ogling and remarks of sexual harassment and trespass on them and their bodies when they were young women and girls. "Hell hath no fury like a woman's (or girl's) scorn." 
     
An excerpt from the 10-25, 2016 issue of SF Chronicle reporting a news release from the Associated Press on a Donald Trump negative reaction to the freedom-of-the-press first amendment of the US Constitution states: "A day after suggesting the First Amendment to the Constitution may give the press too much freedom, he insisted that the media are promoting biased polls to discourage his supporters from voting."  I wonder why he feels this way? Need I say see the above for the answer?

FBI Director James Comey, a Republican, Acting on His Own Accord, Politically (Mis)Using his Official Position and Authority to Shift Flexible Swing-Voter Votes in Election-Deciding Swing Battleground States Toward Trump and GOP Candidates...

FBI Director James Comey, when it most matters, surfaces as a player of power politics, in behalf of his political party affiliation, in which foul is fair and as a man of audacious political artifice and intrigue, attempting to insulate these and his job from accountability and repercussions with excusatory, fault-extricating alibi, wrong-finessing jive talk -- putting his political-party loyalty above his obligation to be politically neutral and nonpartisan in the execution of the duties his office as an administrative federal top executive employee of the federal executive branch of government.

Reported and documented commonly in the mainstream news:  Trump’s longtime business history of failure to pay wages, as well as correct wages, to workers, attorneys firms for legal services, contractors for materials, services and major jobs.

Reported commonly in the mainstream news:  Trump has and/or his entities have been sued numerous times, often successfully, but sometimes his attorneys (apparently changing attorneys) have legally stalled action on suits against him or his entities and worn down plaintiffs by time and expense to them dropping their lawsuits, and has numerous court judgment liens filed against him and/or his enterprises. 

Reported commonly in the mainstream news:  He has filed for bankruptcy six times, involving five or six of his failed businesses.

Between May and Mid June of 2016

Reported commonly in the mainstream news:  Trump made suggestive retaliatory personal threats that he would use the office of the US presidency for punishing his critic British Prime Minister David Cameron, criticizing his (Trump’s) original stance, as hypothetically the next US president, of imposing a blanket ban on the immigration of Muslims to the US (where Muslims are our main and essential allies in the fight against ISIS, al-Qaeda, and radical Islam, in Asia Minor, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the US, plus), in which Britain is a top NATO ally with and of the USA, and for punishing the US federal judge presiding over fraudulent Trump University’s prosecution.  The suggestive retaliatory punishment was contained in Trump’s remarks in the news media in referring to each of these individual, in effect, that he will remember you/this (circa “I will remember this/you when I’m president”) after he is elected president of the US, which is both an illegal and immature, impeachable misuse of the office of the president.

Trump's such remark toward the judge is immediately an illegal attempt, on the part of Trump, in using his GOP credible and voter-qualified quasi-official candidacy for the US presidency, to influence the judge presiding over the current trial of fraudulent Trump University, and a future appeals court judge or panel of judges who might preside over an appeal of the protested adjudication of this trial, to rule favorably for Trump University and Donald Trump or be punished under a Trump presidency.  This is felony attempted coercive influence, by veiled threat, to interfere with and bias the legal independence, neutrality in service and fundamental fairness of the federal judiciary and its judges.  Federal prosecutorial and lawsuit charges need to be brought against Trump promptly for the latter outrageous, illegally egregious transgression.

This madman, Donald Trump, is not running for office to represent and serve the nation and the American people as a nation, the constitution and federal law of our nation and the institutions of the nation; rather, he is running for the office of the US presidency for him to use it to serve himself and represent himself and his private and personal interests, maybe even to protect or salvage the hidden mess and fragility of his endangered empire of financial dominoes.

Public Domain use of my above opinion and commentary is authorized by me, the author.

 



No comments:

Post a Comment