Wednesday, November 11, 2020

Trump’s Failed Election Fight-Back Strategy and Game Plan



Trump’s Failed Election Fight-Back Strategy and Game Plan


(See news article The Hill@thehill· 2h#BREAKING: Trump refuses to accept Biden victory, promises legal challenges http://hill.cm/j7Fosel)

 

POTUS Donald J. Trump is a con artist who personally prides himself on being a brazen, in-your-face con man because, for him, on a win-to-lose ratio basis it is profitable for him, it is a viable business model writ large that has a high-frequency payoff for him and that sustains him quite well.


It's the core of his livelihood, stock-and-trade skillset.

 

Trump will use his transparently and absurd, to most people, false accusations of vote fraud and election stealing from him to both 1.), to try to win or pretend to try to win in and from the US Supreme Court what he lost in the democratic balloting process, by asking the US Supreme Court to disqualify the Biden-Harris winning margins of vote (Six of the 9 US Supreme Court justices are Republican conservatives and 3 of them were appointed by POTUS Trump, whose respective political-party affiliation or partisanship and [debt of] gratefulness to him, as applicable, for his appointments of them as justices on the Supreme Court, he hopes will induce or persuade them to put their partisan politics and [debt of] personal gratitude to him before the US Constitution and system of government leadership selection by election-and-balloting democracy), and 2.), to fundraise political or political-legal donations and grift, via the fake or dishonest cause of political-grievance litigation, from his voting bloc in part to do the former or pretend to do the former. (It is not illegal to publicly make [propagandistic] false allegations that are not statutorily ((by-law)) or administratively false testimony in official or sworn documents or vocally to or before designated law-enforcement personnel, including law-enforcement investigators, in courts and before justices of government courts [who require substantiation or corroboration in the form of material or circumstantial evidence or proof], so it is common for some defendants, some of their attorneys and some personally non-slanderous accusers, including Trump, politicians and lawyers, to utter such lies publicly, until they testify under oath and penalty of perjury as described.) Trump seems to use and exploit his every howl and grievance issue to fundraise and presumably to grift. He's no Gipper; he's the grifter.

 

Trump would like the US Supreme Court to rule that balloting by mail, which he has criticized as corruption and fraud fraught for the 2020 election but not for his 2016 presidential election or any election before or since it, is unconstitutional and not protected by federal Congressional statutory law, although it is authorized by state law and he and millions of US citizens, from the top through bottom of the social classes, have regularly voted by mail in the past to the present time, because, for the 11-03-2020 presidential and national elections, he and GOP leaders encouraged Republican voters to vote in person and Democratic Party leaders encouraged their voters to vote by mail, given the COVID-19 pandemic situation and as a defense against incurring it for voters, as the first voting option and in person as the second option, with the sociological voting effect of these different political party recommendations being that Republican voters dominated the in-person voting, favoring Trump-Pence, and Democratic Party voters dominated the by-mail voting, favoring Biden-Harris. However, the US Consitution grants the states the authority to make the laws governing voting procedures, providing, in view of the 14th and 19th amendments of the US Constitution and federal statutory law against racially, etc., discriminatory state laws and practices, they are equitable and their time frames for these are federally lawful [and reasonable].

 

Expectedly, his team-player (or teammate), shyster personal attorney Looney Rudy Giuliani will be on the payroll disbursement end of the fundraising for this purpose or enterprise.

 

A bit of good, pro-democracy news on the Trumpian-GOP publicly discussed strategy of alternatively securing reelection of Trump as US President through the Electoral College vote by having the state legislatures with Republican Party legislator majorities in swing states -- that the Biden-Harris presidential ticket won the popular vote majorities in, that conferred to the Biden-Harris ticket the electoral votes for those swing states -- to change their state law conferring the state's electoral votes, normally going to the majority popular-vote-winning presidential ticket, to a new law giving the state legislature the exclusive right to grant the state's electoral votes, by GOP majority vote of the GOP-dominated legislature, to whichever candidate ticket the GOP-dominated legislature arbitrarily chooses. By this change of the electoral-vote allocation in the concerned swing states with a legislature with a GOP-dominated majority, the Trump-GOP strategy was for them to give their states' electoral votes, purely GOP Political Party partisanly, to the Trump-Pence ticket, which would reelect the GOP Trump-Pence presidential ticket.

 

However, I read an article on this strategy, on a conservative online news site, that explained it was moot for this year's presidential election, year 2020, because in the 1890s the US Congress passed a law on this same issue providing, in effect and paraphrase, that any such change of state law had to be passed prior to a particular presidential election and was not retroactively applicable to a preceding election (that is, if it were passed after a given, concerned presidential election).  Moreover, the GOP-dominated legislature of the swing state of Pennsylvania, whose majority of popular presidential-candidate votes were won by the presidential-candidate ticket of Biden-Harris, was the first to publicly reject and repudiate the concerned tactic to overturn the will of the majority of voters of Pennsylvania.   The GOP-dominated legislatures of the swing states of Michigan, Nevada and Wisconsin, whose majorities of the popular votes the Biden-Harris presidential ticket won, also publicly rejected and repudiated this tactic.  Commendably, in reference to the democratic-republic form of government of the USA and its states, these GOP-dominated state legislatures thereby have safeguarded the will-of-the-majority-vote indirect democracy, via the classical Republican model of representative democracy, of the Electoral College elector votes and system of voting to elect the president of the USA, electoral votes primarily allocated on a per-state basis to the majority or plurality popular vote winner of the presidential vote of the state, of the individual states.  


(As of Friday, 11-20-2020, Trump and team are yet overtly trying to woo, personally, the leaders of the GOP legislatures in these states to subscribe to this tactic to overturn the will of the voter majority and redirect their states' presidential electoral votes to reelecting Trump as US President in the official Electoral College-vote of Monday, 12-14-2020 for electing the US President from among the presidential candidates.  Where this effort by Trump and team to woo GOP legislative leaders with legislatures dominated by Republicans in the swing states, whose majority voters voted for Biden-Harris for President-VP and earned the latter their states' electoral votes, fails to persuade them to change their electoral laws so they can arbitrarily re-allocate their states' electoral votes retroactively, vis a vis the 11-03-2020 presidential-plus elections, to the losing presidential candidates Republicans Trump-Pence, Trump and Team are tapping the RNC and concerned state Republican Parties to appeal to them to do the same or disrupt the pending vote-tally certifications, the official state end-points, of the presidential election that is precedent to the 12-14-2020 protocol, official Electoral College finalized electoral vote, predetermined based on the electoral votes won by the Biden-Harris versus the Trump-Pence presidential-VP tickets for election of the US President for 2020.  Trump, team and GOP organs are variously also imploring state-level election officials and filing frivolous lawsuits in state and federal courts to stall, stay and disrupt vote-tally certifications of the swing-state elections for President-VP won by Biden-Harris, all indicatively so there will be no state-level official vote-tally certification of a Presidential-VP winner for the concerned swing states won by Biden-Harris by 12-14-2020, the official Electoral College vote day and final vote-tally certification day for President-VP, as well as for the official Electoral College declaration of the winner, with the result that either the GOP-dominated legislatures of the concerned swing states thereby will nevertheless be [presumably lawfully] able to arbitrarily allocate their until-then officially uncertified states' electoral votes on that crucial day [to fellow Republicans Trump-Pence] or the Electoral College will not be able able to proceed with an Electoral College election on that day for US President-VP owing to a shortfall of certified vote tallies and electoral vote allocations from some states, among all 50 states of the USA, for conducting its election and officially declaring the elected US President, which might land adjudication for a remedy or solution to the 2020 US presidential election in the jurisdiction of the US Supreme Court or the US Congress, or worse (a more divisive, socially-politically disordered, broken USA).  It also appears that they are trying concurrently to trump up and seize on an election grievance legality (legal technicality) to take the 2020 US presidential election result to trial before the US Supreme Court, in which to also argue for it to strike down, as federally unconstitutional, the Congressional law of the late 1800s outlawing the retroactive application of changes in state laws governing [the allocation of] state presidential electoral votes.) 


Meanwhile, Trump and his political team are deploying every means -- federal agency, state government, court-action, communications media, human, political figure and disinformation -- at their disposal to disparage and try to cast discredit on the validity of and invalidate and overturn the Biden-Harris election wins in the presidential-election deciding swing states.

Friday, October 16, 2020

Answer to the Question of "If Energy Can Neither Be Created Nor Destroyed, Then How Does It Exist?"

 

Prefaced question posted on the Facebook Stephen Hawking Group forum on 10-10-2020, greatly enlarged upon in this blog post: “'Energy cannot be created nor destroyed.’ If it can’t be created, then how does it even exist?”

(Paraphrased, “If energy and matter in the aggregate can neither be created nor destroyed, but cycle from one to the other perpetually, where did they, or energy-matter, come from?")

My answer:

The answer is in the fundamental, intrinsic factual circumstance that it is impossible for there to be absolute, universal or overall nothing and absolute, universal or overall somethingness, with somethingness being the same as mere essence of any kind, at the same time. Thus, fundamentally, there is either the circumstance of underlying or preexisting overall nothing or the opposite, being somethingness/essence. Mathematically and as a matter of mechanics or literal physics, something cannot come from absolute/ly nothing, even according to the something-from-nothing origin-of-the-universe thesis of some theoretical and cosmological physicists (like Stephen Hawking and Lawrence Krauss), who acknowledge that foremost fundamental space, the closest thing to nothing (with it so being a virtual nothing), is a physical thing, a something, as it empirically is a three-dimensional/four-dimensional (informational-dimensional) volume of expanse, however infinitesimal it may have been or grand it is or may become in size, and that by its mere existence as such it is temporal, a thing of presence, of dwelling and duration, whether infinite, indefinite or finite/circumscribed.

Also, empirically so, vacuum space, a 3-d/4-d volume structure and phenomenon, inheres, is occupied by and generates the quantum energy of a vacuum, of vacuum space and so itself is energetic in the same way that it inherently is the Einsteinian elasticity fabric of space-time (which I hypothesize is actually the inherent, fundamental energy of vacuum space, inclusive of latent or covert gravity-gravitons, quantum force fields, plus) -- a contained physical volume or simply a physical volume, which 3-d/4-d space, space-time is, may unto itself inhere pressure, the same thing as exertion, force and energy. (Even if space ever were or may become a one or any other dimensional structure of space or space-time, it would by its dimensionality still be an informational structure of expanse and a thing, a thing of existence. Only by its absence of all dimensionality and energy, as well as the derivatives of these, like quanta and atomic matter, would space be absolutely nothing.) Since energy is the basis of matter, in math terms the inverse of the Einsteinian equation of the equivalency of energy and matter, E = mc2, space, space-time would be the foundation of the material universe at all levels and neither space, space-time nor energy/energy-matter requires any other source for either's/their existence, though fundamentally energy-matter is/are dependent on 3-d/4-d volume space/space-time for its/their existence and not vice versa.

Analytical evidence, if not proof, that energy precedes matter in existence and is the baseline source of matter or the baseline source of both the cyclic conversion of energy into matter and matter into energy is contained in the same Einsteinian equation of the equivalency of energy and matter in which the product of the equation, the mathematical property, or term, on the right-hand side of the equation, mc2 translates into the law that matter is “'propelled' [implicitly but necessarily 'by an energy source'] at the speed” of light, squared, whereby it [consequently] becomes and is the solo property of nature that is energy (the physical property, or term, on the left-hand side of the equation). Doubly elucidated, the right-hand-side term of the equation mc2 and its law mean by the words “…at the speed of light…” that matter “in motion” is propelled [by an 'energy' source] at the speed of light multiplied by the speed of light (fundamental radiant energy = mass x (186,282 miles ((or 299,792 kilometers)) per second, alternatively 670,616,629 miles per hour,  x 186,282 mps, alternatively 670,616,629 mph ((or 1,079,251,200 kmh)) by a transcendent, superluminal energy propellant force of such a propulsion magnitude, 34.7-billion, 34,700,983,524, miles ((89,875,243,264 km)) per second, exponentially far exceeding the speed of light of 186,282 mps), with [light's rate of] motion or propulsion, or that of any activity per se, being the essential function and inseparable thrust gradient, power load or magnitude, of any kind at any level of existence, of [dynamic] energy and its distinctive feature dynamism. M x c2-speed, in propelling m (including all of its constituent quanta) at a total burn-up, disintegration velocity of 34,700,983,524-billion mps, or 89,875,243,264 kps, I surmise might theoretically be able to transport a retained intact m or its transformed subquantum nebular or coherent radiant state of fundamental, pure [radiant] energy to any neighboring galaxy in perhaps decades to a few years, at a per 30-second travel distance of 1,041,029,505,720 miles ((or 2,696,257,297,920 kilometers)), or  2.082-trillion, 2,082,059,011,440, miles (5,392,514,595,840 kilometers) per minute (mpm or kpm), and explain in part instantaneity [in interaction or functional correlation] between quantumly- or cosmically-entangled particles or objects, in the sense of an infinite or infinite-like [propulsive-energy] speed agent in a finite spatial context.  (Einstein's hunch that there's a hidden cause-effect explanation for quantum or cosmic entanglement instantaneity between entangled quantum particles ((quantum or subatomic matter?)) makes sense in the scenario of an infinite or [locally] infinite-like [propulsive-energy] speed agent in a finite space or such spatial context.  For instance, with reference to the latter point, the c2 energy-speed force, whereas it takes 5.5 hours for the sun's light, traveling at 186,282 miles or 299,792 kilometer per second, to reach the dwarf planet Pluto, an average of 6.9 billion kilometers ((4,287,461,225 miles)) distant from the sun, at the end of the planetary sector of our solar system, it would take c2 circa a 5th ((.20)) of a second to make the same journey and a micro-mini fraction of a second to travel from the Earth to the sun circa 150,000,000 kilometers ((93,000, 000 miles)) away from it, and a teeny-weeny fraction of this fraction of a second to travel from the Earth to Earth's moon at a distance away of 356,500 kilometers away from it ((the average of 225,383 miles away from the sun at its closest and 252,088 miles at its farthest point in distance)).  These c2 internal solar-system travel time spans perhaps could have given early- and mid-20th-Century quantum physicists who pioneered quantum physics the mistaken impression or illusion of instantaneity of quantum entanglement, spooky action at a distance, remotely-in-time-to-become explainable as viewed by Albert Einstein, in interactions, transactions, communications or functional correlations between quantumly-entangled quantum or subatomic particles.  How he came up with the equation E = mc2 confounds my imagination but it conceivably is explanatory of quantum entanglement instantaneity of a broadly local scale.).  Thus, matter is bundled energy, energy is the default actional, dynamic state of itself and both basically are energy but each is a different state of energy.

(One may ask, as I have in my apprehension of the validity of this equation of E = mc2, which is reported to have been confirmed experimentally by MIT in circa 2005 and in Albert Einstein's time by Cockroft and Walton, 1932, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SWVuISPT3A, is/((for me, was)) how the speed of light, the speed limit of the motion or travel or transpiration for all physical things in the universe, could be increased by any amount or be multiplied by itself, by whatever energy source, to achieve such a stupendous, incredible speed?, and by so asking oneself, one would be befuddled like me, other than to speculate that only expanding and/or traveling, therefore energetic, space/space-time, that has been observed and documented by astronomers to be expanding inter-galactically in excess of the speed of light, could do this and carry matter and vacuum-space's hypothetical quantum or subquantum, undifferentiated and united four-forces fundamental energy at such a speed and maybe faster. ((This consideration engenders the idea that there credibly may be universally fundamental space and energy, or space-energy, quantum or cosmic entanglement.))  Nonetheless, the militarily and industrially commonplace splitting of the atom and the conversion of its tiny mass to a humongous quantity of atomic or atomic-nuclear energy is associated with this equation, or a systematic, unwitting light-speed non-transcendent or subluminal version of it, maybe like in a single second the explosion of the concentrated electromagnetic energy of a photon beam, cloud, plasma, etc., containing within it 186,282 x 186,282 photons ((the force carriers of light, electromagnetism or electromagnetic energy)) triggered to mutually collide, or an event with the same number or more of anti-photons and photons that mutually annihilate or explode within a shared second or brief timeframe and release the extreme energy underlying c2, which is highly feasible.)

In sum, it takes energy to convert matter to energy and it takes energy to convert energy to matter, implying that there is always more energy than matter overall naturally, which is the observed case in the proportions of the dark energy (circa 68.5% of the basic content of the observed universe) and dark matter (circa 26.9% of the basic content of the observed universe) to one another in the observed universe. This relationship of imbalance or inequality in the cosmological caloric-mass content found between dark energy and matter in the universe may likewise be the observed case in the proportions of normal (luminous- or baryonic-related) energy and matter to one another in the universe, for which the percentage of the normal matter content is given, in the amount of circa 4.6%, but with no percentage content given for normal energy, which must be a lackadaisical, memed omission and must mean that the normal energy and matter content of the universe are combined, for convenience, in the percentage figure for normal matter from all reputable sources, inasmuch as the given three figures total 100% of the basic energy and matter content of the observable universe.  Despite the unspecified, hidden portion of the normal energy indicatively included with and undifferentiated from normal matter in the percentage quantity given for normal matter in the universe, the reported percentage of the dark energy by itself, absent the unstated amount of normal energy, is more than twice the amount of the sum of both dark matter and normal matter-plus in the universe.

Absolute nothing in this general regard, that of the whole of this narrative, is or would be an impossibility, an absolute impossibility. Furthermore, as a matter of incontrovertible empirical logic, there cannot be any existence that is apart from or beyond space, space-time because any [such theoretical] existence or purported existence would still have to exist somewhere, including apart from or beyond space, space-time, which therefore is somewhere, purportedly but fictitiously "somewhere else" apart from or beyond space, space-time, which is place, a location, a somewhere [else], being space, space-time.  However, hypothetically there could be an external space-time to the space-time of our universe, such as that of a parallel universe or multiverse or a hyperspace.  

     The said impossibility also negates the thesis or theory that space is made or may be made up of a network of quantumly entangled waves or particles or particles and waves or particle-waves, or an analogous foam, web or mush of quantum granules, etc., preexistent to space, space-time because they, by their structures as things, would have to be informational geometrical-spatial stuff, forms, structures or entities, even if they were ethereal shape-shifting stuff, things, etc., and so inescapably they would have to have spatial dimensions or dimensionality as well as have to initially, upon their inception or presence, and forever after be hosted in an environment or context "and always be somewhere" -- "all being space, space-time" -- and with at least infinitesimal space, and therefore space, space-time, separating and in between them in some way as structural identities; and by and for their mere existence, their state of being (the same as their state of duration, their enduring as a something), presence, dwelling and activity, they would be time-bound and engaged in inescapable ongoing-time behavior for the duration of their existence, which if and when it were to decay, entropy or lapse, they would cease to be and they would no longer be of time as they were, although their host and environment space, space-time would survive each and every one of them and yet endure and although their fundamental energy-matter would recycle in the universe (the space, space-time host and context of everything), whether near or far.  

     In addition, it is impossible for a thing to exist while not enduring or being of the state of duration, "time," and it is impossible for a thing to behave or engage in any activity and not engage in actional time or dynamic time, the concomitant of and underlain by energy.  The scientifically known ubiquitous virtual particles of vacuum space fizzing and flickering in and out of existence, as a matter of their behavior (their behaving, their dynamic behavior), too, must be fueled and powered by fundamental energy, the deduced source of their activity and cycling, and functionally are the 100%-correlated products of space, space-time.  Space-time intrinsically must be an autonomous continuum because if it were made up of things or a mass of unitary stuff, default space-time would not exist omnipresently throughout existence as it must wherever there would be separation of or gaps between or within such things or stuff, including virtual particles, force carriers, quarks, and so forth, ad infinitum, reflecting that things and stuff discontinuously pervade space, space-time and could not fill in all of space, space-time nor be the source of space, space-time.  In a practical, but just as impossible, regard, one could better and more plausibly deduce and infer the hypothesis that ubiquitous, fundamental, radiant energy -- the fuel, engine and driver underlying all action, creation, behavior, mutability and morphogenesis, evolution, quanta, matter and everything else of simultaneity of cause-effect, sequentially discrete action-reaction-interaction cause-and-effect physical or kinetic existence -- is the underlying source of space, space-time, were it not for the fact that fundamental energy resides in and is hosted by, as well as is manufactured (unfolds from expanding space, space-time) in the behaviorally elastic fabric of 3-d, 4-d volume space, space-time, in which, in vacuum space, gravity is ostensibly latent or covert (possibly there is such covert gravity, since there may be microgravity or subquantum gravity ((as in the [tethered] orbits of electrons around the nuclei of atoms, the clouds of gluons surrounding quarks in protons and neutrons, the highly dispersed, low-density quantities of quantum particles pervading interplanetary, apparent empty space devoid of resident celestial objects, with possible quantum or subquantum gravity wells from their presence in such space and interactions with neighboring or orbital coupling/s with other quanta, etc.)) and hypothetical gravitons at the fundamental energy state of otherwise vacuum space in which quantum fluctuations in the magnitudes of energy concentrations, and/or fields or energy-speed:energy-time domains constantly and ubiquitously impact by their motion and mass on the fabric of space, space-time, manifesting gravity, whether pull or push or both, at such a state or level of existence) and were it not for the fact that the current astronomy and astrophysics of humanity can trace and observe that space, space-time itself is dynamic and energetic in that 1.), it can cosmologically bend and expand and indicatively shrink in whole to a singularity of a virtually infinitely great-in-magniture, dense and intense infinitesimal mass in its least state in size, which is the evident initial state of the universe based on the CMBR (cosmic microwave background radiation), the fossil-light afterglow of the big-bang birth or emergence of the universe, and 2.), it can locationally do the same at the singularity, or nucleus, of black holes, regions of extreme gravity or extreme gravity wells, in the space, space-time universe of matter.  (Hypothetically, there may be both baryonic-matter state and dark-matter state black holes and they may be capable of interacting directly or indirectly and might indeed interact as pure gravity entities, given that indirectly observed dark matter, indirectly observed by its gravitational effects of enveloping and corraling the boundaries as well as inducing and maintaining the cohesion of galaxies and in gravitationally lensing light in outer space where no other gravitational lensing celestial body of normal matter is present, appears only to interact gravitationally, and directly so, with our baryonic-matter state of the universe.)

Ironically, the only thing that could theoretically precede or lie beyond [informational] space, space-time, the same as fundamental or minimal existence, would be nothing, as a matter of the conceptualized latter's prior but impossible state of [total and absolute] nullity or its probably just as impossible future state of [total and absolute] nullity, with needed for either state of nullity, respectively, being the absence or extinguishment of all energy, matter, energy-matter (including essence or stuff), motion, stasis, behavior, temperature, light, darkness, space (including distance, expanse, place), time (including presence, state of being and duration), dimensionality-geometry and informationality, though oblivion, a parallel universe, a multiverse or hyperspace theoretically could exist beyond our universe. 

Interview on the Subject of Energy with the Ghost of Physicist Albert Einstein

Question:  To your mind and in your theoretical analysis, is there a general explanation for the mysteries of the origin of the universe and its initial state as a singularity, black holes and the singularity of a black hole, instantaneity in the behavioral functional correlation or interface of quantumly entangled particles, etc., and similar or analogous [quantum] teleportation, the superpositional simultaneous multidirectional spins, etc., of a quantum particle, the quantum tunneling of quantum particles, the flickering in and out of existence of virtual particles ubiquitous in vacuum space, and for all atomic matter, including the constitution and behavior of its components, its organization and cosmologically evolutionary products and of all [action-reaction-interaction] cause-and-effect occurrence?

Answer:  Fundamentally, nothing can happen or happens without energy and action.  Energy is the fundamental source and driver of all happening, events, occurrences, transmission, behavior, and so forth, no matter how weird or seemingly inexplicable such phenomena may be.  It is the job of those with the need to understand and know to fathom the implied but unknown or mysterious energy sources, energy states and energy dynamics that would account for all of these phenomena, that sometimes are weird, perplexing, to us, realities of nature.  

The virtually infinitely dense and intense singularity state of the origin of the universe and that of a black hole, as a likewise compression of a likewise infinitesimal point of mass of a, respectively, cosmos-scale and mega- or superstellar-scale, or -capacity, extreme magnitude, would have to have been for the former or be for the latter an energy-governed singularity state, if not a state of likewise extraordinarily concentrated pure energy for either, and the trigger for the big-bang origin of the universe would have necessitated a causal fuel, being energy, and the big-bang cosmogenic event itself would fundamentally have had to have been an energy event.  

     In accordance with the law of cause and effect of the empirically-based explanatory standard model of physics applicable to atoms and the universe built of atoms, an energy source of a magnitude proportional in output to the comprehensive content, size and lifespan of the cosmologically evolutionary universe would have been required for the production of the universe.   

     But quantum physicists report that mathematically the law of cause and effect breaks down, apparently as we know it, at the points of the singularities of the big-bang and black holes and that it does not apply at these points of space (space-time), again, as we know it.  However, perhaps consistent with these mathematics and their translation to such a scientific insinuation or determination, while intellectually preserving the seemingly essential law of cause and effect universally observed by our science to be at work internally in atoms and in the building and cosmological governance of our atomic-molecular stage of the universe, hypothetically the big-bang origin of our universe, from the start-point singularity [of the birth] of the universe, may have been a simultaneous cause-effect event rather than a sequential cause-and-effect event and this same hypothetical principle of simultaneous, instantaneous cause-effect occurrence may be a phenomenon present in quantum-particle entanglement and simultaneous cause-effect entanglement between atoms as well as molecules, plus. Both quantum entanglement and analogous teleportation reflect an act of transmission ostensibly superseding, transcending or canceling the normal, to us, length, travel and latency (wait) factors of and across space and time. This principle of quantum-entanglement simultaneity-instantaneity, in which the extent of the distance between quantumly entangled quantum particles, and for analogous quantum teleportation, has no relevance or influence on the immediacy of occurrence of the mirror behavior or imaging between a behaviorally calibrated or tweaked input, independent-variable quantum particle and its output, respondent dependent-variable counterpart quantum particle mate, hypothetically may be possible because vacuum space itself is energetic and may have no speed limit and may somehow be capable of infinite speed. From the frame of reference of the behavior of the matter that makes up our stage of the universe built of atoms and operating on the sequential law of action, proportional reaction and [proportional or possibly synergistic] interaction cause-and-effect, this quantum entanglement behavior is entirely anomalous and alien to and defies the behavior of [the atomic macrocosmic state of] nature at this level, apart from that of sci-tech artificially quantumly-entangled isolated atoms or molecules, and maybe likewise sci-tech collections of these, and so may be thought of by us as "spooky action at a distance." If this principle is nevertheless quantumly factual, it would suggest or mean that the quantum entanglement relationship of the scientifically observed instantaneity of functionally correlated or synchronized behavior between two or more quantum particles may be or is one of cause-effect simultaneity and infinite speed, at the microcosmic state of nature, of communication, transaction or interaction...  

     Black holes are created by the crushing pull and compression gravity-force (energy) dynamics self-cannibalistically come from and exerted on the collapsing leftover cores of supermassive dead, imploded stars, reducing them to extreme, pure gravity-force (energy) regions, fields or wells in space, or, one might say, a such gravity-force celestial object in space. 

For anything, if it happens, happened or something about it happened, then energy and action are or were the underlying fundamental agents for whatever happens or happened, and energy is or was the underlying fundamental impetus of the action and for the effect of the action, with quanta and atomic matter being the force carriers and implementors of energy and action.  

Lastly, if there is anything of existence that is omnipotent, by definition it would have to be fundamental energy, omnipotent energy, omnipotent-omnipresent [foremost fundamental cosmic] energy whose fundamental, inescapable host and abode would necessarily be space, space-time, which itself is observably energetic.

Click on E = MC2 video at:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SWVuISPT3A

Go figure.  POOF!

Notes

E = mc2 in longhand writing means energy is equal to mass-1 multiplied by velocity-2 (c) of light that itself is multiplied by itself, the velocity of light, first, before Mass is multiplied by Velocity multiplied by itself.  

1.  Mass is the [energy-matter] quantity of inertia, assumedly quantifiable as an energy magnitude or gradient, possessed by a thing (an object, entity or event of any kind or size), the [relative] measure, degree, load or amount of resistance to acceleration or deceleration a thing of any kind or size possesses, somewhat comparable to and correlated with but not weight.

2.  Velocity is synonymous with speed or momentum, which, as well as velocity, are/is a feature of time (the from-to state of existence and duration, lifespan or transpiration span of an object, event or object-event).  

3.  Dynamic time (duration) = distance divided by speed (the speed of travel or transpiration of an object, event or object-event across or upon distance, a length or span of space, in which the speed of the traveler or transient factor is determined by its motional energy capacity and output (Speed = the measurement of position or point A to position or point B in distance divided by the duration of travel or transpiration of that distance by an object, event or object-event (a unit or clip of momentum, akin to tempo or a standardized unit of frequency of a pulse or beat pattern across a distance).  Reductively, in least terms, dynamic time is the durational result of a defined distance divided by the rate of motion of a thing traversing or transpiring upon it.  

4.  Nature is synonymous with and is the cosmologically evolutionary content and behavior of existence and its and their emergent, concomitant rules or laws.  (Informational, informational-dimensional space, space-time, energy, matter, energy-matter, circumstance-happenstance, or vice-versa, context, action-reaction-interaction cause-and-effect, cause-effect, determinism hypothesis)

Afterward Remark:  On the right-hand side of this equation, for anything of reference whose measure of mass is represented and inserted into the equation, the letter-symbol m would be mathematically represented by and replaced with the number expressing the measure of that m, and the mathematician performing the operation of the equation should be cognizant of the fact that in his or her multiplying of m by c2 that in an empirical regard he or she is multiplying m by a momentum that is fueled and propelled by an underlying, unstated magnitude of energy also symbolized by the c2 term representing superluminal speed or rate of motion or travel of m, mathematically expressed in or as miles, kilometers, etc., per second, per minute, per day, per month, per year (light-year).  Also, he or she should bear in mind that energy and speed-time are inseparably intertwined and positively correlated linearly in the equation's behavioral and mathematical result and the application of the equation's fully expressed mathematical result.  

(However, the energy-speed and speed-time relationship or bond diverges according to Einstein's locally-confirmed time dilation theory in which in outer space, highly vacuum space, speed and time systematically become progressively negatively correlated, linearly, so that the higher the speed at which a thing moves the slower in [correspondingly stretching space-time,] time it moves or the slower for it time moves ((or lapses, or so undergoes atomic or subatomic structural decay or entropy related to the universal processes of the mutability and morphing of things:  physical aging?)), which may conflict with the equation of E = mc2 and its "speeds," plural when the m gradient is applied to c2 ((as firstly there is the c2 speed alone and secondly the gradient of m multiplied by c2)).  If photons, light quanta and the force carriers of light, electromagnetism or electromagnetic energy, remain intact and continue to exist ((stasis time)) at their velocity ((a feature of dynamic time)) that is the speed limit of mass in our universe, a speed that theoretically is the time stand-still point for mass in the universe, then the activity ((a feature of dynamic time)) of their continued velocity and enduring presence ((fundamental time)) as things contradicts that time, dynamic or stasis time, has frozen or vanished for them ((reworded:  since, for photons, their motion of traversing distance across space at the speed of light persists, remains ongoing, a time event)), which conceptually has problematic implications for the relationship of [frozen or absence of] time to "mc2."  The solution to the issue with mc2, in borrowing terminology from accounting:  The "bottom line" is that Big E-baseline > c, with this having food-for-thought implications for energy physics.  The longhand translation and implications of Big E-baseline  > c are that the herein hypothesized speed of the fundamental energy of vacuum space, space-time, c2, exponentially exceeds the speed of light, c, and is not constrained by and is not subject to the laws of the universe governing the normal ((baryonic-plus)) energy-matter or mass of the universe, including its quantum particles and forces.  It occurs to me that c2, a mathematical constant, is actually the base or fundamental energy of vacuum space, space-time, in our universe, whose energy and speed magnitudes are the same as those [of the speed] of light multiplied by the speed of light and whose relativistic such magnitudes are variable, varying with different mass gradients for different varieties of mass or a given individual mass, and are mathematically those of the given mass gradient, M ((bundled energy)), multiplied by the c2 base energy of vacuum space, space-time, which together produce relativistic, synergistic Big E-ultra, being mc2, which behaves in the universe like the fundamental energy of vacuum space, space-time, c2, but as a higher energy force than C2 is more powerful and faster than c2.  C2 also suggests that there may be exploratory merit to string theory's concept of co-existing, extra hidden dimensions within, to our perception, standard 3-dimensional, 4-dimensional volume space, space-time, extra dimensions that are relativistic, extreme energy-speed, speed-time scales on a ladder of these with their own regimes or realms of time, space-time ((that may account for the instantaneity or superluminal time behavior of hypothetical wormholes and white holes if they are real, as well as enable quantum particles to assume a circumstance-dependent wave function and engage in quantum tunneling and the weird, extraordinarily complex superpositioning behavior of quantum particles)), within our shell of a bubble of 3-d, 4-d volume space, space-time.  As suggested before in this writing, c2, or c2 as well as mc2, might also account for or contribute to quantum entanglement's, and similar teleportation's, seeming instantaneity of communication, interaction or transaction between entangled particles or more complex matter and explain their accomplishing this phenomenon by their accessing and utilizing c2, or, to add, alternatively, other superluminal extreme energy-speed hidden, extra dimensions of or novel extreme energies and their frequencies, within the space, space-time of our universe.  ((The starting point for deciphering the science of quantum-entanglement, plus, simultaneity and instantaneity -- maybe even including the singularities of black holes -- is to construct exhaustive theories or hypotheses, with an open mind to discovery of, to our sci-tech humanity, new physics along the way, diagrammatically mapping credibly possible quantum object, energy and behavioral mechanisms and dynamics that could best mechanistically explain it, and test these theories or hypotheses in physical or computer-modeling experiments.  The simplest explanations for quantum instantaneity, to me, are, firstly, that expanding and malleable space, space-time itself, whose vacuum generates and hosts the mutable and morphable energy of vacuum space that is the source of the mutable and morphable cosmologically evolutionary quanta and matter of our universe, must by such properties be energetic and may have no, or virtually no, power or speed limits, which in effect may somehow allow entangled quanta to tap into this possibly supreme space, space-time nature of energy and engage in instantaneous complementarity, and, secondly, that quanta operate or co-operate in overlapping parallel [-universe] space, space-times with different energy, emergy-to-matter and relativistic motion and speed regimes, perceptibly and kinetically primarily invisible, materially and chemically, to our science, in which our parallel universe figuratively and comparatively has the speed limit of a snail, that is most extreme and the believed ultimate speed universally, to us, but by comparison with the other universe is a snail's-pace speed limit that is the true speed limit for our universe though not for the other, whereas the counterpart parallel universe has, unbeknownst to us, the unbelievably great and outlaw, to us, speed limit of light^20, while we illusorily observe the entangled quanta from the standpoint of our laggard universe, senses and experimentation measuring methods and means to be engaging in instantaneity and the seeming cancellation, etc., of distanced space-time, yet not time itself since instantaneity of an occurrence is itself time, or a time event, that necessarily occurs during the sci-tech input change to the [signaling, source or change-basis] ying quantum particle entangled with the [mirroring] yang quantum particle.  Quantum-particle entanglement and complementarity are not constructs of scientific debate concerning their reality, each of whose reality is scientifically confirmed; rather, the specific bases of the entanglement and the instantaneity of correlation or synchrony between the entangled particles are subjects for further scientific exploration, research and problem solving, for conclusive, factual answers.  If explanation two, whether or not in conjunction with explanation one, were to prove correct, then quantum-particle entanglement and possibly all weird quantum phenomena may resolve from their interfacing with the twilight-zone of primarily materially and chemically different and mutually invisible overlapping parallel universes, and be a blurry window, collectively, or windows otherwise between or across them, but usefully so scientifically.  As a principle of primordial, fundamental quantum nature, the hypothesis of quantum state cause-effect, action-reaction simultaneity-instantaneity and entanglement might be a pathway toward understanding  and accounting for the general absence of symmetrical antimatter in our state of the universe, as it may be the matter of a parallel antimatter universe mate of our normal matter universe, symmetrically burst into a separate, symmetrical big-bang existence with that of the origin of our universe of normal matter, with perhaps both being mutually invisible or [naturally almost entirely] inaccessible to one another.))  In addition, c2 might explain the nature of the 99.9999... empty space of atoms, as it possibly being the atomically containerized c2 quantum energy of vacuum, volume space, space-time and a sharing source of the tremendous E = mc2 energy release of an atom undergoing nuclear fission or fusion.  Incidentally, on the evening of 10-31-2020, I saw a do-it-yourself science post with two vertically juxtaposed pie charts comparing the sizes of the state of matter, primarily dark matter, of the universe 13.7-billion years ago ((in a 13.82-billion-year-old universe)) versus currently, which reflected that the [primarily dark] matter content of the universe had shrunken greatly across this time frame, implying and making available the hypothesis, if the source of the pie charts is credible and the representations of the pie charts are true, that the decay or entropy of [largely dark] matter and its conversion to mc2 may have increased and may be [contributing significantly to] increasing the energy stock of the universe relative to that of matter and that this process may be fueling the faster-than-light-speed [intergalactic] space, space-time expansion of the universe.)

Practical [Personal] Hypotheses in Explanation of Instantanteity of Complementarity of Quantum State Changes Between Quantumly Entangled Quantum Particles

1.  C2 and mc2 (of Albert Einstein's equation on the equivalency of energy and mass, E=mc2) superluminal speed, if actualities, accessed by quantum behavioral states of quantumly entangled quantum particles.  It would take c2 2.8234672221 minutes to travel one light-year (5,878,625,373,183.6 miles or 9,460,730,472,580.8 kilometers ) or 11.293868888 minutes to travel 4.22 light-years, the latter to the closest star-planetary system Proxima Centauri.  This energy-speed would convey to the sci-tech of our species broadly locally apparent instantaneity of complementarity in change of quantum states between the entangled particles.

2.  Extreme energy-velocity extradimensional regimes to the normal 3-dimensional, 4-dimensional volume space-time of the universe accessed by the quantum behavioral states of quantumly entangled quantum particles.  This would convey to our sci-tech universe-wide apparent instantaneity of complementarity in change of quantum states between the entangled particles.

3.  Extreme energy-velocity, superluminal to that of our universe, of a far higher baseline energy-velocity regime of a parallel universe accessed by the quantum behavioral states of quantumly entangled quantum particles.  This would convey to our sci-tech universe-wide apparent instantaneity of complementarity in change of quantum states between the entangled particles. 

4.  Quantum-state space-time compression via the quantum behavioral states of quantumly entangled quantum particles.  

5.  Reversion to and/or access of the primordial quantum state of the pointal unidimensional space-time singularity precedent to or the initial existential state of and precipitative of the big-bang cosmogenic event of the universe by the quantum [informational] behavioral states of the instantaneity of complementarity quantumly entangled quantum particles.  Space-time may have no speed limit and may be capable of infinite speed. 

6.  Quantum-state, of singularity-state emergence and origin, informationality, in which informationality is concurrent with and inextricably integral to dimensional space-time, of any "number" of dimensions, and all things of existence, for the informational behavioral states of complementarity entangled quantum particles, may have no speed limit and may be capable of infinite speed, because all possibilities of what is existentially possible in evolutionary cosmological reality were contained in the pointal unidimensional space-time singularity, for which informationality with indicatively supremely energetic space-time constituted that singularity and was concurrent with and inextricably integral to that cosmologically primordial singularity identity of space-time.


 

 

Sunday, March 22, 2020

Brain-picking and brain-storming science on coping with the COVID-19 virus and pandemic

Brain-picking and brain-storming science on coping with the COVID-19 virus and pandemic. Routinely updated. Has click-on audio link to Nobel MD's interview on COVID-19.

In paraphrase of a Nobel laureate MD-epidemiologist, Devra Davis, of the Environmental Health Trust, lecturing on KPFA radio, during the second segment of the Flash Points program, on this subject on 03-18-2020, hyperlink at https://www.reddit.com/user/LordProphet/draft/fe636af4-6cae-11ea-8ad5-4296ea72963b: Zinc nutritional supplements [preferably capsules or lozenges (30 or 50 milligrams of zinc per unit, being a capsule, pill, etc., in my speculation)], reputed antivirals and immune-system boosters, ingested while reclined or at bedtime, might aid the body in preventing or fighting a COVID-19 infection, a rhino-respiratory system attack-virus -- an aid; not a cure. Dr. Devra Davis, MD, also cites an apparently verified anecdotal account of a near-death COVID-19-stricken hospital patient who made a full health recovery after medically being administered massive doses of medically controversial and therapeutically dubious vitamin C*, which the patient and her family implored be administered to her as a last-resort try to save her life. Health risk factors, such as preexisting heart, respiratory or lung, diabetic, smoking, unsanitary, unhygienic or toxic behavior or environments, or refractory psychological depression issues, make the affected persons most vulnerable to the ravages of COVID-19 regardless of age or the potential mitigating effects of intervention therapies.

(She made an error in fully naming COVID-19's loose, less potent respiratory-infection-virus-relative SARS, whose correct name is "Severe Acute Respiratory [System Sickness] Syndrome" and not South Asian Respiratory Syndrome. All humans make errors, even humanity's preeminent genius Albert Einstein, and so do the best of machines. I often make dyslexic-related and wrong-recall writing errors.)

Considerations of mine, a non-medical person: Wrapping/bundling cannabis leaf in facial tissue, that is secured as closed with Scotch tape. similar tape, or one or more rubber bands, and regularly nasally or orally deeply inhaling from it and then exhaling may be therapeutic for the respiratory system in preventing the COVID-19 virus from shutting down the lungs and respiratory system that thereby causes death for a so susceptible COVID-19 infected person. Vapo rub regularly rubbed into the throat area and chest areas over the lungs as well as so coating the nostrils of the nose with vapo-rub covered cotton balls, coinciding with the initial or early appearance of COVID-19, or cold or flu, symptoms, may be as beneficial or more beneficial. Ideally, if advisable by one's personal physician, one might do all three. Consult your personal physician on the wisdom and advisability on doing these three things or any one of them to contend with the COVID-19 pandemic or one's personal symptoms of it.

It is normally safe and helpful to do daily light physical and mental exercise, even if only to take a stroll or rhythmically move or dance to music or exercise while lying down or in bed or while sitting in a chair, to visit the garden, a park or other green space and deep breathing there in the midst of plants, to drink a hot or cold cup of organic green tea or pure organic juices with their pulp (not reconstituted juice and not with any additives of any kind, including vitamins, etc), to eat meals with lots of [cooked] fresh vegetables and a fresh, raw fruit with each meal, to adequately toilet and blow (cleanout) one's nose and get at least 7 hours of sleep daily, as well as practice good daily oral and general bodily hygiene and good home and public sanitation.

If one is seriously stricken by COVID-19 and has impaired breathing, in addition to doing all of the foregoing if approved by an appropriate medical doctor, MD, one might also nevertheless cough out and spit out vigorously as frequently and much as one feels necessary obstructive and discomforting mucous and/or blood, etc., build-up in one’s respiratory tract or system -- and at a minimum water-splash the sink clean with liquid hand soap after each cough-spitting bout.

*There have been medical efficacy studies done on vitamin C that discrepantly have found it to be medically beneficial and to have no medical effect, positive or negative, with the latter reportedly having been the consistent finding in most recent such studies. The indicated consensus of all of these studies is that medically acceptable significant doses of vitamin C could have at least a positive effect for treating some people stricken by a flu, cold or related respiratory sickness (a clinically commonly believed "placebo effect," which is a therapeutic effect based on a [positively motivated or determined] state of mind or emotions influencing bodily functionality) but not an adverse treatment effect, meaning it would not worsen such an ill-health condition. A placebo effect is the opposite of a psychosomatic ill-health condition. A placebo effect is a positive psychogenic effect improving the functionality of the body whereas a psychosomatic condition or effect is a negative psychogenic effect impairing the functionality of the body, in which each type of effect auto-hypnotically mobilizes the body's biological machinery respectively toward improved versus degraded psycho-physical functioning. However, the recent no-significant-effect findings of discrepant findings among the whole of these vitamin C studies could be by-chance streak-outcomes, or by-chance streak-findings, resulting from certain blood-types subjects in both the experimental and control groups test-compared having not been screened for or systematically pre-identified in any of the studies (thus not permitting them, the different blood type subgroups, to be examined as diagnostic-study subgroups within the main vitamin C study). This potential experimental study oversight or shortcoming, or both, may by chance have been associated with a particular blood subgroup of subjects having overwhelmingly dominated both comparison groups in the recent medical efficacy studies on vitamin C, in which case it could be that people of certain significantly underrepresented blood types in the studies may really scientifically, directly biologically, benefit from particular therapeutically optimal doses of vitamin C, apart from being amenable or susceptible to a psychogenic, auto-hypnotic placebo effect. By the way, it is questionable that the placebo effect can be a delusional effect or a delusion if it has a real and enduring or permanent ameliorative or curative effect on actual bodily sickness or ill-health.

Friday, January 17, 2020

Proposition [Proposing] that Energy-Event Action-Reaction Cause-and-Effect Dynamics Fueled, Initiated (Engendered) and Powered the Cosmogenic Big-bang of Our Universe, Ostensibly an Actional Energy Event

Upon awaking from a long, deep sleep (18.5 hours), the morning of Monday, 01-13-2020, in which I had numerous ridiculous dreams, I had a cosmological insight approaching a solution, to my thinking, to the debate among physicists as to whether or not the big-bang origin of the universe -- a scientific fact, as opposed to a theory, affirmed by the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), also known as the fossil-light afterglow redshift of the big-bang (explosion, combustion, eruption, blast, inflation, burgeoning...) emergence of the (our) universe, as well as by the telescopically-observed ever-expanding space overall between the galaxies and size of the universe -- theoretically occurred spontaneously on its own from nothing, a theory supposedly supported by the mathematics of the singularity space-time-mass state of the big bang and black holes and the black-wall cosmological horizon of the big bang, ruling out the presence of action-reaction cause-and-effect dynamics. My insight was in the question: Was the big bang an action, was it actional? And my answer was yes, with certainty, the "big-bang origin (or 'inception')" of our universe, as a process [of nature], from its fundamental state of being a space-time-mass singularity had to be actional and action. It was an energy-driven actional, action event, in which action (any dynamism, such as motion, movement, activity, vibration, friction, force, thrust, tension, inward or outward pressure, etc.) is intrinsically a characteristic of and integral to energy (as well as to dynamical time, where time is the from-to ongoing state of existence, or state of being, of something or somethingness and its rate/speed and length of duration ((also subsuming change, progression, increase, decrease, entropy, transit and transpiration)), which may be finite, indefinite or infinite) and energy is intrinsically actional and an action event. (Dynamical time = distance or length divided by the rate/speed of transit or transpiration, or an equivalent of the latter, wherein the structures of time are its stasis-versus-dynamical state, its object or event rate or speed of transit or transpiration across distance, and ultimately its length or duration.)  So action necessarily had to be and deductively one can rationally conclude that it therefore was present from the very beginning for the emergence of our universe. Thus, there had to be a proportional action-reaction cause-and-effect fuel and trigger to power the big bang and its ultimate output and expression, and the singularity (a virtually infinitely dense and intense ((compressed and pressurized)) infinitesimal or extremely small, compact mass) had to be somewhere, in an environment, a context, a greater space-time.  In this state of affairs, the cosmogenic big-bang evolutionary event of the (our) universe was the apparent subsequent actional event (the reaction action) and the actional energy-fuel source for the production of the cosmogenic big-bang event was its apparent antecedent initiating actional event (the causal action for the reaction action).

I have always been of the mind that the big-bang origin of our universe required a context for the presence of its singularity, and a powering fuel (really physicist's Brian Greene's explication), trigger and proportional action-reaction cause-and-effect dynamics for its production. Maybe the mathematics of our species' ruling out cause-and-effect at work as the impetus for the big-bang origin of our universe are insufficient and maybe more advanced mathematics may affirm and explain cause-and-effect for singularities. (By the way, fundamentally what are black holes and their singularities? They are extreme, pure gravity-energy regions and wells of space-time that consume all energy and matter that fall into them or that they capture and they compress and convert that other energy and matter into the pure gravity that constitutes them.  Gravity and antigravity, or theoretical gravitons and antigravitons, may be bosonic, and the singularities of black holes, which may, as supermassive black holes, contain the energy mass of hundreds of billions of stars or star systems, as measured by the mass of our star the sun, and the singularity of the cosmogenic big-bang actional energy-event may have been of an extreme gravitational nature, like that of black holes, or a such gravitational inversion, or both.)  It may be that our universe is a bubble space-time-mass universe within a greater universe, according to this cosmogenic initiating-action insight and cosmological viewpoint.

Parallel universe and multiverse ideas and conceptualizations from which our universe may have been produced are widely held and tendered propositions among physicists but are critiqued as empirically untestable and unanswerable, unprovable, as either true or false.

The totality of my argument is encapsulated in the empirical logic (deduction) that the origin or nature of the origin of the cosmogenic big bang was, 1., without a doubt and unarguably an action and actional, a crucial element of cause-and-effect dynamics and, 2., that reaction in itself is action, but an opposite action ensuing from a precipitating or impactful action or an interaction, 3., thus both initiating action, or input/impactful action, and precipitated action, or output action (reaction) are basically and inescapably the same thing, action or actions, 4., meaning that [proportional] action-reaction cause-and-effect energy or fuel energy (at a minimum) powering dynamics had to be operative for and at the beginning and all stages of the singularity of and in the cosmogenic big-bang of our universe, despite any mathematics forbidding this. Furthermore, given this deductively actional necessary process and scenario of the cosmogenic big bang, the singularity, necessary fuel energy and trigger for that action and cause-in-effect dynamics had to have a context, an environment, a space-time host.

However, in deference to the mathematics said by celebrity theoretical string physicist Michio Kaku to reflect that cause and effect breakdown and are precluded at the singularities of black holes and the big bang, it may be that the concerned mathematics apply to and negate discrete individual actions within a sequence of multiple actions (such as action, reaction, interaction) rather than apply to and negate action or seeming pure action itself, which for the initiation of the cosmogenic big bang may have been in structure and behavior a bosonic action and reaction (or interaction), in which a boson is a quantum particle that can occupy simultaneously the same space-time as another boson: a physically, in space-time, maximally intimate form of quantum entanglement. The quantum-entanglement of the union and [interactive] synergy or disunion of these two actions, proactive action and reaction action, might deceptively be identified mistakenly by quantitative physicists and cosmologists, or theoretical cosmological physicists, as only, or solely, one action, either a cosmogenic proactive action or cosmogenic reactive action instead of structurally as a unitary simultaneity in space-time of both proactive action and reactive action.  (Incidentally, our astronomy and physics have established that the fundamental generic material of our universe that produces and constitutes all of its phenomena is dark energy ((circa 71.4% of the mass of our universe)), dark matter ((circa 24% of the mass of our universe)) and baryonic matter ((circa 4.6% of the mass of the universe, also called luminous matter)) but make no reference to the possible counterpart of dark energy, which would be luminous energy.  Could hypothetically missing luminous energy be bosonically entangled with dark energy?)  Pointedly, this means that mathematics and evidentiary cosmological theory indicating that the big-bang inception of our universe ensued from a single, autonomous causal action novel to and inconsistent with the otherwise energy-matter action-reaction cause-and-effect determinism universal to and within the state of our macro-universe may just as well as have been determined by (been a determinism of} an energy-event action-reaction unitary simultaneity of two bosonic actions, or multiples of these, occupying and entangled in the same space-time, action-reaction cause-and-effect dynamics that are consistent with natural and universal macro-universe-state cause-and-effect determinism and even the statistical probability dynamics and outcomes of quantum-particle mechanics.  Multiplex-state bosons may explain some weird quantum-particle behavior, such as superposition behavior in which a quantum particle can spin left and right, or up and down, or all, simultaneously.