Let’s Not Be Sucker Punched by Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche (Previously a Private Attorney to Trump and Epstein-Crimes Soft-Plea-Deal Broker) and POTUS Donald Trump on the 01-06-2021 Insurrectionist Riot and Attack and Its Participants, as an Innocent Event and Innocent Victims of Wrongful Federal Criminal Prosecution During the Joe Biden Presidency
If, allegedly, innocent persons were prosecuted for involvement in the 01-06-2021 insurrectionist riotous attack on the chambers of the US Congress, whose members, together with the Vice President (then VPOTUS Mike Pence) of the USA, were convening to certify the US Electoral College electoral vote affirming the 11-03-2020 election of Joe Biden as [the new] US president, then properly let them prove in federal criminal court that they were innocent and wrongly prosecuted of that federal felony crime before they qualify for and seek financial compensation for their alleged wrongful prosecution and conviction, and, if they are found in federal criminal court to have been wrongly prosecuted and convicted for the said riotous attack, let them seek by court order the court-determined and -awarded financial compensation from the at-fault prosecutorial department or agency of the federal government of the USA, as is the normal process, although rare in an innocent-finding outcome.
Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche does not have the legal authority in any body of US law to exempt any person or entity, on any individual or collective selective, or special, basis, from the law, or laws of the USA, and legal processes of being held accountable to the law and subject to law enforcement for non-compliance with or violation of the law. No person or entity, or subset of persons or entities, in the USA or subject to the jurisdiction of the USA is above or exempt from its federal and, situationally, state as well as local laws that do not violate US Constitutional law nor in the very least, literally and in principle, is above or exempt from the US Constitution and US Constitutional law.
Neither the US Attorney General nor President, nor do they together, possesses the legal federal statutory or constitutional authority to establish an extrajudicial or extra-legislative function of government, in the form of such a federal Executive Branch [of the federal government] commission, board or panel, per se, as well as any that can, furthermore, overrule, contravene or set aside federal, state or local government court adjudications and rulings. They cannot expropriate from and confer to themselves, to the federal Executive Branch of government and US President (Article II of the US Constitution), and his/her subordinate the US Attorney General, the government powers conferred by the US Constitution respectively to, and exclusively to, the judicial branch of the federal government (Article III of the US Constitution) and/or to, and exclusively to, the Congressional-legislative branch of government (Article I of the US Constitution). Nevertheless, they will use bluff Executive Branch schemes and administrative processes and pseudo-legal, legalese-legalistic-shyster, documentation transactions to dictatorially obtain, or try to, and centralize in the Constitutionally transgressive incumbent US presidency these dictatorial expropriations of counterpart-peer judicial and legislative and law-making branches-of-government otherwise exclusive US Constitutional powers.
In point of the applicable events and matters, POTUS Donald Trump cannot ethically or validly legally use the unauthorized and, if intentionally done so, illegal release in 2019, during Trump's first term as POTUS, to public publicity sources or news media of his US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax records or IRS tax-related information on him or some of them or it by a rogue IRS employee, to sue the IRS in 2026 for $10,000,000,000, or scam, and abscond with, the herein described settlement, in significant part in taxpayer-paid tax money either way, in lieu of it, in reputational damages to him and his businesses as well as emotional harm to him personally resulting from the unauthorized release when there are statutory-law limits in time for filing suit and in compensation remedies, including monetary amounts and employee discipline, inclusive of the firing from employment with the IRS the offender employee if the release was evidentially intentional or was the result of careless or reckless disregard, federal statutory law specifications that have applied to other so injured parties historically. POTUS Trump recently appointed Todd Blanche as the acting US Attorney General and Blanche has negotiated a settlement of the said Trump lawsuit against the IRS for $1,776,000,000.00 that is to go to his particular MAGA-Trump personality-cult zealot followers who, presidentially pardoned of their insurrectionist and related assault criminal convictions and prison sentences by Trump after he was inaugurated POTUS again on 01-20-2025 following his reelection as US president in the US presidential election of 11-05-2024, were criminally prosecuted and sentenced to federal prison for their participation in the 01-06-2021 insurrectionist riotous attack on the chambers of the US Congress, which resulted in their assault on, grave bodily injury to and deaths of members of the national capital's federal police force. Vice President J.D. Vance has explained that the terms of the settlement of Trump's lawsuit provide for the establishment of a commission, whose members, as commissioners, will be Trump presidential appointees, and who will adjudicate and decide financial compensation awards on cases of claimed weaponization of federal government prosecution of them on the part of 01-06-2021 insurrectionist rioters. The terms of the settlement by acting AG Blanche also bar any financial and/or tax investigation and audit of Trump, any of his businesses, or his family members and their businesses for past years, permanently. Not only did Blanche negotiate the soft-criminal-sentencing initial criminal prosecution plea deal with and for Jeffrey Epstein in the not-so-distant past, but upon his appointment by Trump as the acting US Attorney General he bluffingly stated, in effect, that it was time to end the Jeffrey Epstein matter, whose viewed and released files contained abundant and scandalous references and pictures of Trump, according to sources who accessed them, and that the Justice Department would not be releasing the remainder, approximately half of their total, of the Epstein files to the US Congress that by overwhelming majority votes of both houses of the US Congress, the Congress thereby legislatively, by law, ordered be released to it. Not the US President, nor the US Attorney, nor the US Department of Justice, nor the Director of the FBI and nor the FBI has legislative and law-making authority nor the legal authority to defy or overrule the US Constitutional legislative and law-making power and authority of the US Congress. Todd Blanche also was the representative of Trump or his current administration's Department of Justice who relatively recently interviewed Jeffrey Epstein's reputed collaborator and longtime gal pal federal convict Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted for her participation in the Epstein crimes, in her prison cell shortly before she was transferred to a minimum security prison, without explanation -- he has the aura of shyster, shyster, shyster, sleaze and corrupt engulfing him totally.
Since as US President it is the case that POTUS Donald Trumps appoints, with the advice and voting consent of the US Senate, the US attorney general of the US Department of Justice, the secretary of the US Department of the Treasury and the commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, which is an agency within and subject to policy regulation by and accountability to the US Treasury Department, and they serve in these political appointment offices constitutionally "at the pleasure of the President" and can be removed from their offices arbitrarily without the right of appeal or any legal recourse on their part, and can be replaced by the President with someone else more compliant to him and his corrupt will and to his better liking, at any time, they are effectively at the mercy of the President for their such jobs and have no true decision-making independence in matters or proceedings such as in the hereinabove described situation in which the President hints or suggests that they, or positions or directs or pressures them to, serve his personal and corrupt interest in violation of federal ethics and constitutional and statutory law and at the financial expense of the nation's taxpayers and to his self-gain in popularity with his political powerbase or a faction of it or to his self-enrichment, in net part or whole, etc. Such a relationship between the President and his at-will disposable subordinate executive heads of federal executive branch departments and agencies and their legal and litigation service to him personally in their therein capacities is one of an unethical and federally unlawful conflict of interest and self-dealing on the part of the President and his and their collaborative, with him, administrative looting of US Treasury and taxpayer money to the control, disposal or ownership and benefit of the President, bypassing the Article I of the US Constitution exclusive authority of the US Congress to appropriate and allocate federal funds and funding. Congress has already made and set federal statutory-law financial compensation and compensation limits for unauthorized disclosures of federal government information on persons or private citizens and there is a provision that allows offenders in willful illegal disclosures to be personally sued within the law's term of the statute of limitations for litigation, compensation which the federal judiciary should decide or make arrangements for in federal court proceedings. Federal executive branch department and agency bosses, or heads, and personnel must have no federal involvement in the President's personal, or personal legal, affairs.