What Could Ensue as a Corrective If Crazy-man, Wanna-be Der Fuhrer POTUS Trump Attempts Again to Overturn the US Constitutional and Federal Statutory Law and Processes on Elections and Election Results, Now Appliable to the 11-03-2026 Midterm National Elections,
But this time by him declaring and attempting to institute martial law, and therewith invalidate some or all of the midterm elections or their results by presidential executive order (although presidential executive orders are not law and the US president does not have any legislative or law-making authority or power, authority and power which the US Constitution assigns, at the federal level of US government, exclusively to the US Congress), or by the words and/or actions of any official of authority, or number of them, of the executive branch, and by federalizing and activating the National Guards of the states and deploying them and federal armed forces, doubly illegally for the latter, to establish martial law for or to accomplish this illegal purpose:
The governors are the commanders in chief of the state contingents of the National Guard, which are referred to in the US Constitution as the state militias, who, even in that capacity, can themselves lawfully refuse to comply with an unlawful presidential order and lawfully must do so, such as in currently the credibly potential case that, in violation of nationally supreme US Constitutional law on elections (which, in addition to its own prescriptions on elections, assigns jurisdiction and control of elections to US Congressional statutory law and subordinately to state-government law, that is compliant with superior US Constitutional and Congressional law on elections, and to state governments for administration), the president, acting audaciously, egregiously and treasonously illegally, in a completely new tactic to that of the 01-06-2021 insurrection attempt that failed, to override nationally supreme constitutional law to take over jurisdiction and control of elections and elections results and personally decide the validity and winners and losers of elections, declares any number or all of the midterm elections or their results to be illegitimate and invalid and further declares a national emergency and crisis state of martial for the USA or any of its states, concerning the midterm elections and issues a presidential order or directive for the governors or their in-service, uniformed operational commanders of the National Guard armed forces to use them to impose national emergency and crisis state martial law and to secure, freeze and seize state-based voter ballots and elections records, or for them to aid federal executive-branch personnel in doing so, would be the use of their National Guards for an illegal, treasonously unconstitutional purpose. The incumbent president might attempt, like in the 01-06-2021 insurrectionist, cling-to-power coup attempt, a symptom or psychological trait of true power addiction, another power-addict, audacious, scofflaw power-retention grab in reaction to and to act to extinguish 1.), doomsday, for him, midterm net elections results that are unfavorable, or grossly so, to him keeping his super-dominant political power and his/the GOP majorities, his political party compatriots, in both houses of the US Congress, from which he has/had derived, until the midterm elections, his evident largely unaccountable and lawless governance power and license, as an imperious president like no other US president, for megalomaniacal profligacy, extravagance, self-idolization, self-idolatry and pompous self-promotion and self-puffery, nepotism and cronyism, warmongering, piracy and international economic bullying at US taxpayer-money and asset and citizenry-household-budget expense and in the grandiose spending of US Treasury taxpayer money as well as, to his private benefit, in the vendor-leveraging of the office of the US presidency, and 2.), to prevent a new political-party majority change in the US Congress that, if it happens, would result in a showdown, over the long-overdue balance due for release, by federal statutory law, to the bicameral US Congress, of circa three-million more pages, of required-to-be-untampered-with Epstein-Island pedophile files, between the White House together with US DOJ-AG.FBI, as a joint party, and the newly elected, possible Democratic Party new majority-membership of the law-maker and government-oversight US Congress, with impeachment power over the US president and his executive branch political-appointee department and agency heads, probably constituting a worrying, throbbing headache and nightmare prospect for the president.
Moreover, the governors can order their National Guard armed forces, all officers, troops and personnel thereof, whose default and routine control, by established US Constitutional law, comes under state jurisdiction, to refuse to comply with the president's illegal order for them to participate in the president's and executive branch's interference in and exercise, and arrogated seizure, of control over state-based elections and/or their results, over which the US Constitution and Congressional law, subordinate to the US Constitution, assign legal jurisdiction exclusively to the US Congress and state governments, the latter, with regard to elections, headed by the state legislatures and their legislated state law/s regulating elections in compliance with priority federal constitutional and congressional law concerning elections and the conduct of elections, and by governors and other within-state elected and legally appointed elections oversight and managing officials subordinate to the state legislatures and governors. The US president and executive branch, namely and specifically in this scenario, the Department of Justice and US attorney general, have no independent and unilateral legal authority to regulate or control US elections or their results at any level of government in the USA, whether federal, state, county or municipal, other than pursuant to law-enforcement actions, authorized by standing textual law and federal court rulings on the standing law, against evidenced, before and adjudged and affirmed by the federal judiciary, specific violators and their violations of the elections law, and not based on accusations or suspicions, on the part of the US president or executive-branch federal officials or agency authorities, of election violations not adjudicated by a federal court of law or not based in law-cited prima-facie, factually substantiated violation/s of the US Constitution. The court/s must decide legal culpability and the remedy or punishment for the violation, according to the standing law, and the appropriate law-enforcement officials and system must administer the judicial order for remedy or punishment. Governors and state legislatures can also legally issue, in exercise of their federal constitutional right of freedom of speech that is not seditious of the US Constitution and federal statutory law, public entreaties to the US Armed Forces high command, officer corps, intelligence units, troops and other personnel to disobey, or rebel against, en masse the unlawful such order/s and the US Congress can do the same chorally and by congressional resolution and it can legislatively, by a 2/3rds vote in both houses of the US Congress, grant protection and unbreachable continuance of their pay and the routine or normal performance of their duties as well as protection of their job security and careers, thereupon and for thereafter, from presidential and executive branch retaliation and punishment. State attorneys general can file suit in federal courts to protect the right of the governors, as commanders in chief of the National Guards of their states, and National Guard armed forces to refuse to comply with the illegal presidential order and the right of the governors as commanders in chief of their National Guard armed forces to order their National Guard armed forces and civilian personnel to refuse to obey as well as to disobey an illegal presidential or federal executive-branch order. Except in times of civil disorder, beyond the power of the government of a state or the states to suppress or manage with its/their own law enforcement and National Guard contingent, or invasion of the USA or territories by foreign armed forces, or the commitment and deployment of state National Guard armed forces to war abroad, by authorization of the US Congress, can the US president federalize the National Guards of the states or any one of them -- recently, one or two federal court judges has/have ruled that the US president can, for the duration of the exigency, federalize troops of a National Guard to guard and protect federal property in states where and when the federal property is credibly at imminent risk by and in the proximity of active social or civil unrest.
A collective of the state attorneys general could also venture to include in their litigation to uphold and protect the stated law-abiding and compliance right of their state National Guard armed-forces personnel, from and against illegal presidential and federal executive-branch orders to violate the law. litigation to uphold and protect the same right of federal armed-forces personnel, on the whole, to refuse to comply with, also with lifelong legal and administrative immunity to repercussions from the president and executive branch bosses, an illegal presidential or federal executive-branch order, as well as their right to sue the US president or US presidency, and armed-forces leadership secretaries and/or their armed-forces or federal state departments, and with the same right applicable against their top director-oversight-and-review responsible decision-making subordinates on hiring, careers, assignments, performance ratings, personnel actions and adverse action (including prosecutions, reprimands, demotions and early non-honorable military service discharges, etc.), promotions and retirement, of the armed forces personnel, for favored treatment of armed-forces co-workers or peer personnel compliant with illegal orders and unfavorable, passive or forthright, by action, tepid action or inaction, treatment of personnel noncompliant with illegal orders, including the right of the latter category, on an individual basis, to a conscientious honorable discharge from military service, and in case of such suit-related early military service discharge, a conscientious honorable discharge with lifetime full veterans benefits. In general, resignations from military service, or from job assignments that are subjected to implementing compliance with illegal orders, of top commanding commissioned officers and non-commissioned officers (command sergeants major and sergeants major) in their protest of and refusal to comply with illegal presidential, federal executive-branch or chain-of-command orders should qualify them, by law, immediately, exempt from firing or any punishment, upon their voiced or communicated written notice of their resignation, even if unacknowledged, not accepted or unread, for an early conscientious honorable discharge from military service with all of their theretofore-earned rank and honors and full retirement and veterans benefits -- this should be so because they are most among soldiers in closest contact, directly or indirectly, with controlling political leaders and their influence and pressures and are the soldier sources to initiate dissemination and enforcement of the illegal orders.
State, county and city attorneys and municipal district attorneys within states, together with state and local police and county sheriff forces backing them and their personnel, can, in accordance with federal constitutional law, legally deny executive branch law-enforcement personnel such as US Department of Justice attorneys and FBI agents from receiving upon their demand or their seizing voter ballots and other election records of states and their governance subdivisions, over which the US Constitution gives the states jurisdiction and not the US president and the federal executive-branch DOJ or any department, agency, function or authority of the executive branch, which they could only legally be entitled to and obtain pursuant to a federal court proceeding and judicial ruling ordering their release, with just legal cause and in compliance with standing US Constitutional and federal statutory law permitting the involuntary release, to the US Department of Justice. State, county and municipal attorneys and law-enforcement forces should be prepared to protect -- as a matter of a federally constitutional state emergency of US Constitutionally illegal presidential and federal executive-branch subversion and insurrection against the US Constitution in unilaterally acting to control and/or interfere with state-based elections or their results -- federal buildings and federal courts from shutdown in such an event and secure the persons, families and homes and vehicles of federal judges and their court personnel, including compliant US Marshals.
If Trump as US president does order a successfully implemented shutdown of federal buildings and work operations in reaction to or related to the midterm elections, which would be to prevent federal courts and judges from conducting their work and making rulings on the legality, or, rather, illegality, of Trump's and the DOJ's attempts to seize control of state election records and results and decide on their own the legitimacy of the elections and who are their winners, then the governors and/or state legislatures could provide either, or all, state, county or municipal court accommodations to federal judges for them to continue, without interruption, to perform their federal judicial duties and make rulings, with full news-media coverage and public reporting, on the anti-Constitutional elections actions and coup, or coup attempt, by Trump and his presidential administration.
Finally, given the occurrence of such a presidential and federal executive-branch coup event in insurrection of and against the US Constitution and in violation of the president’s and his presidential administration’s, on the part of each of its employees’, sworn-oath-of-office pledge of loyalty to the US Constitution, and thereby and thereupon to its/our Constitutional Bill of Rights, Government Of, By and For the People, Republic, the president and all of the political appointee heads of the departments, agencies and administrative offices of the federal executive branch of our government should be collectively and summarily impeached in an expedited one- to two-day impeachment process by the bicameral US Congress in a joint proceeding, based solely on documented presentations of the observed, documented and recorded illegal conduct and actions of the defendants and their subordinates illegally executing their illegal orders and directives. They should be cast out of government office, employment and service, comprehensively and permanently, including all of their subordinates executing their illegal orders and directive, like, Be gone Satan!, demons cast out into and tumbling endlessly in boundless darkness.
Our Constitutional Bill-of-Rights, Government Of, By and For the People, E Pluribus Unum Republic of the United State of America shall endure and prevail, and do so mightily and interminably against all transgressors, true enemies, against it, directly and specifically against it, our Constitutional Republic Of, By and For the People (the national common good and commonweath of the USA itself, not an oligarchy or in the interest or service of an oligarchy or oligarchs or an oligarch), against all of specifically its enemies, of the territorial Constitutional Republic of the USA, foreign and domestic, high and low and in-between, interminably.
There is much more to say on this consideration but there is no more time and labor for me to say. However, I may revisit this writing to upgrade and improve its readability.
Thank you. May our votes and combined, resolute courage long save and sustain our Constitutional Bill of Rights, Of, By and For the People, E Pluribus Unum, Republic form of government of the USA.
