As the Saying Goes: “Buyer Beware,” As Regards Trump and Netanyahu and Their War Against Iran

As the Saying Goes: “Buyer Beware,” As Regards Trump and Netanyahu and Their War Against Iran

In another of Trump’s egomaniacal wargasm wars, now joined in partnership with another of Israel’s imperial Zionist political-economic hegemonic, ethnic-cleansing and genocidal wars in the Middle East and West Asia, the maxim applies, as we are witnessing in the news-reporting media and even in the pro-MAGA-AIPAC partisan and influenced news media supportive of them, the first casualty of war, of the holier-than-thou, vigilante holy war that they initiated and are perpetrating against Iran, is truth, as wounded and killed by these unsavory, morally degenerate death-dealing, necrophile-necromaniac, warmongering kleptomaniac partners and their propaganda-marketing-ploy sham Board of Peace. Be mindful of their characteristic mendacity, cunning and depravity in this adventure of theirs and be on guard in judging from news reports, which indeed may be true, of Iranian missiles or combat drones having struck the nations of Turkey or Azerbaijan and that, not reliably, they were therefore launched against them by Iranian forces, rather than possibly actually by US or Israeli forces, or their undercover collaborators, using appropriated, counterfeit or captured-but-recycled Iranian missiles or drones, as a ruse to justify and draw bombing and shooting attacks from other nations in the region on and against Iran and to win for the US and Israel their permission to use their nations for military bases for their armed forces to execute, additional, encirclement-positioning attacks on Iran, as well as to possibly win over and draw infantry ground armed forces from them and NATO nations to undertake a ground invasion war in and against Iran to wholly occupy and conquer Iran. In almost every nation in the world, there is, given its enablement and means and sense of feasible success, a mix of the potentially rebellious elements, that is referred to as the or a fifth column, such as in the USA the KKK, neo-Nazis, neo-Confederates, mono-cultural white ethno-statists and white Christian Nationalists (a contradiction of and heretical to and blasphemous of foundational Christianity and the legacy quintessence of Christianity, that is based on the way of life and teachings of Jesus the Christ, the Messiah, and the evangelist of the God of Love, of altruistic, fraternal, communitarian love, of the New Testament Bible), that can be stoked into rebellion, revolution against and the overturning of the incumbent government for regime and government system change, as happened in relatively recent years for Tunisia, Egypt (temporarily and briefly so), Libya, Syria, etc., often historically for the regime change government to be no better for the population writ large than that it replaced. Trump and Netanyahu have been publicly stoking the uprising of the fifth column in Iran, to use it, and a divide-and-conquer civil war sought by them to be brought about from it there, in their pursuit of achieving their own self-centered, selfish objectives with Iran, a fifth-column such uprising that, as most often happens, the incumbent governance regime counterattacks and attempts to suppress or suppresses violently.

For Trump and Hegseth, it is an egotistical power-display war in exhibition of their military-power identity, (like before in Iran, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_strikes_on_Iranian_nuclear_sites , in Nigeria and Venezuela) and for its self-indulgence and their, along with that of their American-chauvinist MAGA-America-First political powerbase, self-glorification, self-flattery and gloating, as well as for the intimidation of all others (like Greenland-Denmark, Canada, Panama, Columbia, Mexico, South Africa, etc.) in others' observance of their military might, really the USA armed forces military might that they control (as their man-child superhero-fantasy but real-life superpower toys), and others' fearful submission to it. It is also a politically strategic world-mass-news-media protracted news event and controversy for re-focusing US and world public news media attention away from the Epstein pedophile-island files and the release, newly, by the DOJ, under pressure by an almost consensus of the mass news media and the US Congress, of heretofore missing FBI-investigation-related Epstein files, which had the equivalent of indexing or page numbers on them allowing for the detection that they were missing from the Epstein files that were previously released to and required by the US Congress, newly released files that directly implicated Trump in the alleged penile-insertion blowjob rape and punching assault, by him, then of a reportedly 13-15 year-old girl victim (of his), who is a living adult and willing testifying witness, https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/donald-trump-epstein-files-allegations-00816123 , https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/key-details-13-old-trump-033732373.html? , https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/doj-source-verdict-13-old-003917680.html? , Whoa!, indication of prison murder of Jeffrey Epstein by correctional officer, for pay, and its cover-up: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/epstein-prison-guard-made-suspicious-132416347.html -- meaning that this war has the loud overtone that it is an intended US-superpower triumphalist war, against an easy war-victim target and prey, of distraction from this damning controversy that conveniently is also a war that the government of Israel, most vigorously that led by its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has been prodding, if not begging, the US presidents to conduct, full scale and decisively in victory, for circa decades and that serves and is intended to benefit Israel foremost, enduringly, at the expense, indirectly and directly, of its strongly AIPAC et al.-commandeered and subservient big-brother USA government, its armed forces and taxpayers and taxpayers' tax money, and to the domestic sacrifice of the latter and its benefit and national services and benefits programs of various critical kinds from its own taxpayer-paid tax money.

For both Israel and the Trump US Presidency, it was modus operandi: turning into an ambush thought-to-be genuine and sincere resolution negotiations on the part of now Iran and before Hamas with the same bombing surprise-attack duplicitous attacker parties, Israel and the Trump USA Presidency, in the midst of negotiations talks, in each instance, that, respectively, the Iranian and Hamas negotiators believed to be pending successful negotiations (for Iran, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/28/us-israel-bomb-iran-a-timeline-of-talks-and-threats-leading-up-to-attacks , for Hamas, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_attack_on_Doha ), negotiations that upon the bombing by the attackers the bombing attackers denounced as failed negotiations and with the attacked parties demonized by them in demonization mass news media campaigns. The US negotiators in the apparently doomed-from-the-beginning but US-Israeli pretense-and-PR-show negotiations with Iran were, reportedly pro-Israel, Steve Witkoff, a real-estate business tycoon and longtime personal friend of Trump, and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner. The core and original purpose of the negotiations was for Iran to eliminate verifiably its technical means for developing a nuclear weapon. However, with the mass unrest in Iran in January of 2026, encouraged publicly by Trump and possibly ginned up by social-political agitation operatives of the Trump Presidency and government of Israel (something the government of Israel and Trump first publicly did during their first, on 06-13-2025, surprise bombing attack on Iran but which the Iranian public overwhelmingly rejected, concluding that an affiliation with Israel and Trump would be much worse for Iran and the Iranian population than with them having their Iranian incumbent authoritarian, semi-democratic theocratic regime) and violently suppressed by the government of Iran, this became an additional justification for Trump to threaten to take military action against Iran and change or try to change its government, although, hypocritically, Trump illegally, in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, federal statutory law, of 1878 outlawing the placement and use of federal troops for law enforcement in the USA except in cases of national emergency events, military invasion, the enforcement of US Constitutional law when it is defiantly breached and not enforced locally, or requested by a governor when there is civil disorder within a state that is nearly beyond the control of local and state law enforcement, including the state National Guard, he federalized state National Guards and deployed National Guard and federal armed forces troops in US cities, in black American and Democratic Party mayoralty cities, on various pretexts, including crime rates, although national crime reports showed that highest crime rates in cities were in cities governed in politically red states by GOP mayoralties, and he and Hegseth convened a meeting of US generals and admirals in which he stated that he might call on them to use US cities, apparently in black and Democratic Party mayoralty cities, for combat training and that he would be establishing a rapid-response strike force to act domestically. There is a tiresomely long list of other transgressions by Trump and his presidential administration committed against US Constitutional and international law, domestic and foreign citizen and human rights, as well as their unlawful, in breach of legal due-process and independent and fair judiciary verdict-determination and sentencing processes, taking of lives. Regime change of the government of Iran, to one compliant, more bluntly, obedient, to themselves, was always the underlying and central interest to Israel and the USA in Iran.

Latest One of the Trump Presidency's Justifications for the Vigilante War Against Iran

Trump: "Iran was within weeks of producing a nuclear bomb and using it against us. They posed an imminent danger to us, Israel and the world. I stopped them." Freshman high school class: "But the USA has circa 5,000 nuclear bombs, Russia has more than 5,000 of them and more than the USA, Israel has circa 200 of them, Britain and France have hundreds of them, each India and Pakistan has scores of them, and North Korea has a small stockpile of them, all of which nations have long-range nuclear warhead launch missiles and missile systems that can strike Iran and most of which nations can strike one another's nations with them, GPS such guided missiles, virtually anywhere of their choosing and for which anti-missile defenses are of no effect since even if a nuclear-warhead missile is hit by a deterrent missile the resulting enormous thermal, [blast] shrapnel and radiation shower and emissions effect over the target area would still broadly impact it lethally and destructively, making it a scorched-earth wasteland, with and upon its detonation. All can also launch them by fighter jets and most by warships and submarines. The Iranian government and military leaders know this and so do the Iranian people and most people throughout the world. They know that such an attack would result in the nuclear-attack disintegration and vaporization of most of all of civilization of their nation. The idea that Iran would dare to pose an imminent nuclear-strike threat, as Mr. Stupid Trump incredibly and preposterously claims, to the USA, Israel or all nations of the world with their highly doubtful in-the-making one Iranian nuclear bomb is a pathetic, grossly stupid and nonsensical, in-your-face childishly transparent lie." He has been clearly incriminated in the Epstein Island pedophile depravity via the newly released batch of missing Epstein files to the US Congress that it discovered missing and demanded from the US Department of Justice. This war is his hopeful news headlines subject-matter redirecting and controlling, for weeks or months, politricks trick to distract national and world attention from them and bury them from public interest, care and consciousness in the political patriotism fog of war.

(Approximate words of Trump)

The Coordinated Trumpian-US and Israeli, Respective, Naval and Air Force Aerial Bombing Attacks on Iran Is Another Attempt by Them at Terrorizing an Unconditional Surrender Regime Change of Iran's Government Leadership to a New Leadership, Including of Its Armed Forces and Police Forces, that Would be Acceptable to Them and that They Would Control, in the Interest of Israel

The Coordinated Trumpian-US and Israeli, Respective, Naval and Air Force Surprise Aerial Bombing Attacks on Iran, initiated on the Morning of Saturday, 02-28-2026, circa 9:16 a.m. of Its City of Tehran Time, Is Another Attempt by Them at Terrorizing an Unconditional Surrender Regime Change of Iran's Government Leadership to a New Leadership, Including of Its Armed Forces and Police Forces, that Would be Acceptable to Them and that They Would Control, in the Interest of Israel, with Trump Being the Benefactor and Israel the Beneficiary

The Iranian military has a robust hi-tech electronic GPS drone-warfare capability and shared it with Russia, which is using it massively almost every day against Ukraine, which has it own, too, and its own system for manufacturing warfare drones, said to be the best in Europe and that produces warfare drones as good as those of the USA, which the Russians, from their captures of Ukraine’s drones, study to upgrade their now own drone-warfare manufacturing technology, which they probably share with Iran (previously Russia's main supplier of warfare drones), the PRC (China) and North Korea, Russia’s steady friends. Iran’s standing military can be expected to ongoingly upgrade and use its ballistic-missile and drone warfare capability and endure and reply to, over the very long term, its now mutual aerial ballistic warfare with and against Israel and the US naval armada and the USA's small and vulnerable military bases in neighboring nations, some of whose regimes and most of whose populations view both as genocidal imperialist hegemonic land and natural resources grabbers and parasitical moneygrubber crusaders and economic colonists, imperial Zionists and their big-brother backer, gladiator and collaborator the USA government and its armed forces (Dare I say: Capisci, each Venezuela, Canada, Panama, West Bank and Gaza Palestine, Greenland and Denmark, European NATO and Western Europe? Trump's claim of the USA's national security need for other peoples' property and disciplining and controlling other nations is the mask and rationale for his representing ulterior, private, economic colonial priority interests, internal and external to the USA.). Iran has already proven that it can engage in intense and grueling decades-length war and defeat a military invasion and occupation, more so than Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria, all of which did, at great cost to themselves. Likely, Iran will get all variety of long-term support in its war from the Central Asia '‘-stan” nations of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, among others thereabouts. It already looks like Iran has targeted with aerial missile-launch and drone bombing attacks, and will attempt to destroy them, all US military bases in the entire region, as its first main-focus priority. Its combat drones might now be outfitted with cameras, a feature Russia innovated for and has on its drones for its military personnel to witness unquestionably where they strike and their destructive impacts, and may deploy high-speed marine-drone anti-ship mines, along with aerial bombing and combination bombing-and-bullet drones, against the nearby US armada (Ukraine has done something akin to this successfully on occasion to Russian warships) and resort, like Afghanistan resistance forces successfully did against the air force of the one-time Soviet Union occupation forces of their nation and like Ukraine successfully did to Russian fighter jets, largely rendering them a Russian liability, early in the Russian armed forces invasion of Ukraine, to attacking raids of expensive Israeli and US fighter-jet bombers in its air space with cheap portable, shoulder-mounted, but contemporary, anti-aircraft guided-surface-to-air [launch] missile systems, as well as combat-unit mobile, multi-launch anti-aircraft systems, perhaps as day-and-night capable camera-sensor-triggered attack drones, to rid them and the advisability of their use in the skies of and against Iran by Israel and the USA, https://youtu.be/JSl9E3Q42ko?si=DBXAhjD0qkwFICLT, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-portable_air-defense_system. Trump’s top generals and admirals cautioned him against this offensive military adventure (unconstitutional act of war), but expect that he will blame them and fire some of them, as his scapegoat fall guys, for its, being his, military misadventure if and when it goes awry.

Also, check out the click-on-to-view photos of portable, mini shoulder-mount anti-aircraft surface-to-air missile and combat-unit mobile, multi-missile anti-aircraft systems:

Photos of shoulder-mounted anti-aircraft surface-to-air missile systems https://www.google.com/search?q=Photos+of+shoulder-mounted+anti-aircraft+surface-to-air+missile+systems&sca_esv=37a6bd0bd2466e07&biw=1366&bih=638&ei=-L6lad3ZGISp0PEP_ejCqQw&ved=0ahUKEwjdteep1YGTAxWEFDQIHX20MMUQ4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=Photos+of+shoulder-mounted+anti-aircraft+surface-to-air+missile+systems&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiR1Bob3RvcyBvZiBzaG91bGRlci1tb3VudGVkIGFudGktYWlyY3JhZnQgc3VyZmFjZS10by1haXIgbWlzc2lsZSBzeXN0ZW1zSISMA1CvV1iEqAJwAXgAkAEAmAGAAaAB6RmqAQUxNi4xOLgBA8gBAPgBAZgCF6ACxBTCAggQABiwAxjvBcICCxAAGIAEGLADGKIEwgILEAAYsAMYogQYiQXCAgUQABjvBcICCBAAGIAEGKIEwgIIEAAYogQYiQXCAggQIRigARjDBMICChAhGKABGMMEGAqYAwCIBgGQBgOSBwQzLjIwoAeCZLIHBDIuMjC4B6wUwgcGMi0xNy42yAeiAYAIAA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Photos of combat-unit mobile multi-launch surface-to-air anti-aircraft missile systems https://www.google.com/search?q=Photos+of+anti-aircraft+missile+systems&sca_esv=37a6bd0bd2466e07&biw=1366&bih=638&ei=2b6laapQhrDQ8Q__roqoAw&ved=0ahUKEwjqoOua1YGTAxUGGDQIHX-XAjUQ4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=Photos+of+anti-aircraft+missile+systems&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiJ1Bob3RvcyBvZiBhbnRpLWFpcmNyYWZ0IG1pc3NpbGUgc3lzdGVtczIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYqwIyBRAhGKsCMgUQIRirAkj1zgFQ-wpYsogBcAN4AZABAJgBsAGgAbkKqgEDMi45uAEDyAEA-AEBmAINoAKOC8ICChAAGLADGNYEGEfCAgYQABgHGB7CAgYQABgNGB7CAggQABgFGA0YHsICBRAAGO8FwgIIEAAYgAQYogTCAgoQIRigARjDBBgKwgIIECEYoAEYwwSYAwCIBgGQBgiSBwM0LjmgB8UnsgcDMS45uAfaCsIHBzItOC40LjHIB3eACAA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp 

Strange Testimony by the US Secretary of State on the Basis for the Attacks on Iran:  https://x.com/i/status/2029005011519517171

Trump Frenzy and Tantrums Over Pending Ruling on Birthright Citizenship and Recent Ruling on Presidential Tariffs by the US Supreme Court

Trump Frenzy and Tantrums Over Pending Ruling on Birthright Citizenship and Recent Ruling on Presidential Tariffs by the US Supreme Court

Trump rails against birthright citizenship in rambling Truth Social post and warns Supreme Court about keeping it https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-rails-against-birthright-citizenship-123638438.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr via u/YahooNews

He is Mr. Babyman Stupid spouting off his ignoramus mouth about loyalty to the [US] Constitution while evidencing hardly a clue as to what it says. As to birthright citizenship, tell that windbag idiot and his stooped-over, sloth-footed and lumbering hippo-in-a-suit and insult-contriving smack-attack cliche-snorting-and-grunting communications director, and their MAGA airhead echo-chamber mob chorus of White House anti-Constitutional mobsters, to read what the text, the stated written law, of the supreme law of the supreme US Constitution prescribes to constitute US citizenship:

AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.

Section 1.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

On this matter of US citizenship, the supreme US Constitution, in its hereinabove quoted supreme constitutional law, prescribes unambiguously and clearly in the language of its own text as to what constitutes US citizenship. It speaks for itself definitively and with finality, and is not subject to outside re-interpretation, glib, gaslighting, sophistry, chicanery, etc., and overlay tampering in or by the federal or any other US courts or political or governance bodies. It is textual standing supreme US Constitutional law that the justices of the US Supreme Court are duty bound to adhere to, uphold, re-state and reaffirm in their judicial ruling as to what the law is as to what constitutes qualified US citizenship according to the language of the US Constitution and determine who or what is in violation or conflict with the said US Constitutional law, and are duty bound to order and enforce compliance with that US Constitutional law. Neither the judicial system, including its Supreme Court, nor the president of the USA has any US Constitutional legislative and law-making authority, powers, which, instead, the US Constitution confers exclusively on the US Congress, https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm#a1, whose federal statutory laws in the USA are subordinate only the US Constitution and its laws. However, the US Congress cannot lawfully, that is, Constitutionally lawfully, change US Constitutional law except by the [arduous] amendment process of the US Constitution prescribed by and in the US Constitution.

Likewise, the US Supreme Court was US Constitutionally duty bound to rule, as it did in its 6-to-3 judicial ruling among its 9 justices (which should have been 9 to 0, to have been 100%, unanimous, in adherence and fealty to the US Constitution), that the US president had no sovereign authority, independently of or autonomously from the US Congress or the US Constitution, to levy tariffs, a taxation and levying authority (subsuming and including all charges and fees) on any or all [US Congressionally or Constitutionally referenced] designation of goods, services, etc., or equitable per-capita measure of persons, such as for the purpose of allocating federal funds...) as well as all legislative authority, both authorities of which are conferred exclusively to the US Congress in Article I of the US Constitution, https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-rejects-trumps-global-tariffs-2026-02-20/ . The Supreme Court determined that President Trump neither in the historical context of its applicable use by past presidents granted the same authority by the same legislative act of the US Congress, nor in his use of that US Congressional act, wrongfully to impose tariffs, acted in accord with the language prescribing the intended use of the act by a president lawfully as regards the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-91/pdf/STATUTE-91-Pg1625.pdf, which authorizes the president to seize assets, block [financial] transactions and to prosecute offenders for sentences of 20 years of imprisonment and substantial fines during a national emergency, such as in providing or receiving financial support connected to international terrorism, rampant organized crime, guerilla war, subversion and insurrection, riots, etc., a federal statuary law that makes no reference to or provision for the incumbent president to impose tariffs or taxes of any kind nor of the president being granted the right to do so, to independently impose tariffs in emergencies. President Trump has been referencing the IEEPA as his legal source of authority for imposing tariffs based on his argument that the net trade deficit of the USA with other nations is a national emergency and that he has the authority under IEEPA to arrogate the exclusive US Constitutional authority and power of the US Congress to impose tariffs on his own initiative as an economic tool of his as US president to engineer the balance of trade between the USA and each of the other nations of the world, universally, in favor of the USA, America first. Moreover, one justice factually and crucially, from a legality standpoint, pointed out, in effect, that the US Congress, nevertheless, did not have the right to delegate its exclusive US Constitutional power to tax and impose tariffs, without changing the US Constitution through the amendment process of the US Constitution to delegate or share it with the president, with the terms of the sharing still needing therein to be clearly stated, delineated and circumscribed, as to under what circumstances and generally for how long, the emergency power of the president to impose tariffs, tariff taxes (import or export taxes, as distinct from income, sales or consumption, etc., taxes), would apply. The underlying message of this ruling by the Supreme Court was that if the president lawfully, US Constitutionally so, wants to impose tariffs that he can go to the US Congress and request that it pass legislation to impose them.

Failed US DOJ's Attempted Grand Jury Indictment of Constitutionally Lawful 1st Amendment Conscientious Freedom of Speech of Congressmembers on Frivolous Legal Grounds as Seditious Conspiracy Speech, aka Treason

Failed US DOJ's Attempted Grand Jury Indictment of Constitutionally Lawful 1st Amendment Conscientious Freedom of Speech of Congressmembers on Frivolous Legal Grounds as Seditious Conspiracy Speech, aka Treason

Click on the following hyperlink to read the news article:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/democrats-want-turn-tables-pirro-161648527.html

Also click below to read a news on a federal judge's ruling that US DOD Secretary Hegseth violated US Senator Mark Kelly's same right by attempting to punish it: https://www.newser.com/story/383643/judge-blocks-hegseth-from-punishing-sen-kelly.html

 

 

Writer's Commentary

 

The Trump administration's objective in bringing sham criminal charges against members of the US Congress, before a federal grand jury for its indictment of them for seditious conspiracy, aka treason, for their exercise of their US Constitutional right of not only free speech but of conscientious free speech was for the Trump administration to attempt to establish by means of the federal legal process that free speech is treasonous when it is criticism of the US President (Trump), when it says that the President is speaking or acting unlawfully when he is speaking and/or acting in violation of the US Constitution or US Congressional federal statutory law, when it says that the members of the armed forces should not (,moreover, that they must not,) obey [or comply with and execute] illegal orders issued to them by the US President or any others in the armed-forces chain of command, "a thou shalt not" armed-forces institutional commandment which is already part of their formal boot-camp or basic-training and continuing armed-forces US Uniform Code of Military Justice code-of-conduct training, and when it says that they, as US armed forces and federal personnel, swear or pledge an oath of allegiance only to the US Constitution, and to defend, protect and uphold it, which in its manifestation and embodiment is the Constitutional Bill-of-Rights Republic system of government and national ethos and society, and its and their integrity, of the United States of America.  

 

The hope of the Trump presidency's thus attempted spurious litigation and prosecution is or was, as well as that of its comparable legal system attempts are, to use Trump-for-Fuhrer and MAGA-GOP-First politically partisan and civically ignorant people of legal impact of the federal legal processes and judiciary to render pseudo-legal verdicts or judicial rulings contradictory to and in violation of the supreme-law US Constitution, as well as, in violation of, subordinate only to the US Constitution, US Congressional federal statutory law, that legally pretend, and fraudulently purvey the legalistic illusion, in mass public perception and belief, that the US President is above, exempt from and not subject to US Constitutional law (which creates the office and powers of the US president and other branches and positions of the top governance officials of the US federal government) and US Congressional federal statutory law, and that, falsely, the US President (Trump) and his powers supersede them and all law, and that, therefore, his illegal acts and orders are not really illegal but are always legal, albeit when they are in violation of the US Constitution and US Congressional statutory law, as well as that the status of their legality must not be questioned and challenged, and that to question and challenge the legality of and possible wrongful compliance with his actions and orders is treasonous speech and treason against the United States of America, punishable by death, as though he singularly summarily constitutes and represents the totality of the bodies of law and the system and institutions of the US government and governance of the USA.

[Constitution of the United States, https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm

Article 1 (Characterization, powers and governance jurisdiction of the US Congress stated in the US Constitution)
Section 1   Section 2   Section 3   Section 4   Section 5   Section 6   Section 7   
Section 8   Section 9   Section 10

Section 1 (The US Congress)

"All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives." ....

Section 7

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. ....

Section 8

The Congress shall have Power

To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States; To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; ....;

[The US Constitutional Authorities of the US Congress Over the US Armed Forces and Sole Power to Authorize Acts of War and Declare War, Antecedent and In Addition to Its Subsequent Federal Statutory Law Authorities Over New Branches of the Armed Forces]

*****To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations; To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

*****To provide and maintain a Navy;

*****To "make Rules" for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; (So, the US Congress and members of the US Congress do have the right and authority to speak out and advise members of the US Armed Forces to refuse to obey and carry out an illegal order, also consistent with US Uniform Code of Military Justice, issued by any superior in the armed forces' chain of command, including by the secretary of the Department of Defense and/or the US president or vice president, and the US president is subordinate and subject to its rules of governance of the armed forces.)

*****To provide for organizing, arming, "and disciplining, the Militia," "and for 'governing' such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States," reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, "and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;" (So, again, the US president, even as the US Constitutional commander in chief of the US Armed Forces is, nevertheless, US Constitutionally subordinate and subject to the US Constitutional authority of the US Congress as regards its oversight, regulation, use and legal governance of the US Armed Forces.)

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And

"To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." (Thus, as the US Constitution explicitly confers all legislative and law-making authority for the USA and its government and governance exclusively on the US Congress, the US president cannot have and has no law-making authority and his or her executive orders (which are policy directives or commands to executive branch personnel for their implementation of them as operational practices or action/s) and military orders (likewise) that pose as law are unlawful, invalid and null and void as well as are subject to adjudication as fraud in a trial when they have or could have adverse consequences. They must comply with both the US Constitution and its law and US Congressional statutory law in order for them to be lawful and valid. If there is a conflict between these two bodies of law, then the presidential executive orders or military orders must comply foremost with the supreme US Constitution and its law, to which all federal government officials, including members of the US Congress and president and vice president, and personnel swear an oath of allegiance to preserve, uphold and defend or one to such an effect.)

Incidentally, the US Congress has additional powers stated in Article III, which is applicable to the federal judiciary, of the US Constitution.

Section 3

The US Supreme Court ruling that a US president cannot be prosecuted for illegalities or crimes that he or she commits, or may commit, in the course of his/her executing his/her official duties is a wrongful judicial ruling as it contradicts the text of the US Constitution itself and so is subject to review and a trial of impeachment and vacating of that ruling itself by an independent prosecutor, and team, and all-states, interstate-state, collective constitutional-review supreme court, composed of a lottery-chosen justice from each of the state supreme courts, commissioned and convened by the US Congress, or its Senate, for impeachment trying of the wrongful SCOTUS ruling violating the text of the US Constitution, in that provision 7 of section 3 of article 1 of the US Constitution in verbatim states:

Section 3: "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. 'Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law'" -- for treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors. This prescription, and its language, of the US Constitution makes clear that all government officials, including the US president, are subject to the laws of the United States of America.]

 

 

(Quote

 

US Sen. Elissa Slotkin

 

 

@SenatorSlotkin·02-11-2026

 

(When the President threatens you and it results in threats to your family. That is enough to keep a lot of people quiet. That's the point. The intimidation is the point. So others watch and say, "That's not for me." But yesterday, a Grand Jury of anonymous citizens pushed back.))

____________________________________________________________________________

Shift of focus to some Valentine’s Day extended weekend complimentary music for your hoped-for enjoyment. Check it out:

Heart, Heart - Heart of Gold: Solo performed by Felton Pilate and duet by Felton Pilate and Gail Mauldrew. Two oldies presented in celebration of this Valentine’s Day and extended holiday weekend 

(Glitch-free) 

Click on the following link to hear the two love songs:

https://open.substack.com/pub/aofl/p/heart-heart-heart-of-gold-solo-performed-2b0?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trump Offshoring the Money from the Sale of the Oil Cargo on Board the Venezuelan Oil Tankers Seized, at His Command, by the US Navy

Click-on-to-view news articles are highlighted or underlined

Trump Offshoring the Money from the Sale of the Oil Cargo on Board the Venezuelan Oil Tankers Seized, at His Command, by the US Navy

"Trump Is Reportedly Funneling Money From Venezuelan Oil Sales To a Bank Account in Qatar https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-reportedly-funneling-money-venezuelan-041430420.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr via u/YahooNews"

Trump is using the US federal government and his official office of service in it as US president and commander in chief of the US armed forces and using the US military itself, unconstitutionally, without the constitutionally required prior knowledge, consent and vote of approval of fully both houses of the US Congress (to which the US Constitution assigns the sole authority to authorize and declare war, including acts of war), on his own initiative in unconstitutionally organizing and ordering a US military operation and deadly attack on Venezuela and seizing its leader and declaring his seizure and ownership of its national oil resources as well as reportedly naming himself the interim new head of state of Venezuela, in brazen violation, disregard and defiance, and so far, with impunity, of the US Constitution and US Uniform Code of Military Justice (to which both Trump as commander in chief of the US armed forces and Hegseth as secretary of the US Department of Defense, newly alternatively named the US Department of War, in thereby being members of the US armed forces, are also subject and accountable), and federal and international law and law-enforcement. He is now furthermore undertaking unconstitutionally to sequester this seized foreign economic resource from the constitutional control and disposition of the US Congress, in which the US Constitution assigns all fiscal, revenue, budgetary, monetary, commerce and economic (treasury) authority to the US Congress, although the executive branch department and agency administrators of these functions are appointed by the US president, but with the advice and consent vote of approval of the US Senate, and he is funneling its income offshore so as to bypass US constitutionally required control of it by the US Congress and implicitly create with it an extra-constitutional, independent treasury income, budgetary and funding resource and asset for the Trump US presidency that is wholly and discretionarily controlled by Trump as the US president. So far, the Venezuela oil-sourced money coming to the Trump US presidency has been coming from the Trump administration's piracy sale of the oil cargo on board the at-sea Venezuelan oil tankers piracy-seized at the command of the Trump administration by the US Navy or Coast Guard, seizures and sales not authorized by the US Congress, https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-hands-first-sale-swiped-150105918.html .

Legal References

Constitution of the United States, https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm

Preamble   Article I   Article II   Article III   Article IV   Article V   Article VI   
Article VII AMENDMENTS

Article I

Section 1   Section 2   Section 3   Section 4   Section 5   Section 6        Section 7 Section 8   Section 9   Section 10 

Section 1 (Characterization, powers and governance jurisdiction of the US Congress stated in the US Constitution)

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representative.

Section 7

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States: If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.

Section 8

The Congress shall have Power

To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

[The US Constitutional Authorities of the US Congress Over the US Armed Forces and Sole Power to Authorize Acts of War and Declare War, Antecedent and In Addition to Its Subsequent Federal Statutory Law Authorities Over New Branches of the Armed Forces]

*****To "define and punish" Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

*****To "declare War," grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and "make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"

*****To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

*****To provide and maintain a Navy;

*****To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; (So, the US Congress and members of the US Congress do have the right and authority to speak out and advise members of the US Armed Forces to refuse to obey and carry out an illegal order, also consistent with US Uniform Code of Military Justice, issued by any superior in the armed forces' chain of command, including by the secretary of the Department of Defense/War and/or the US president or vice president, and the US president is subordinate and subject to its rules of governance of the armed forces.)

*****To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

*****To provide for organizing, arming, and "disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States," reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress; (So, again, the US president, even as the US Constitutional commander in chief of the US Armed Forces is, nevertheless, US Constitutionally subordinate and subject to the US Constitutional authority of the US Congress as regards its oversight, regulation, use and legal governance of the US Armed Forces.)

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And

"To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." (Thus, as the US Constitution explicitly confers all legislative and law-making authority for the USA and its government and governance exclusively on the US Congress, the US president cannot have and has no law-making authority and his or her executive orders (which are policy directives or commands to executive branch personnel for their implementation of them as operational practices or action/s) and military orders (likewise) that pose as law are unlawful, invalid and null and void as well as are subject to adjudication as fraud in a trial when they have or could have adverse consequences. They must comply with both the US Constitution and its law and US Congressional statutory law in order for them to be lawful and valid. If there is a conflict between these two bodies of law, then the presidential executive orders or military orders must comply foremost with the supreme US Constitution and its law, to which all federal government officials, including members of the US Congress and president and vice president, and personnel swear an oath of allegiance to preserve, uphold and defend or one to such an effect.)

Incidentally, the US Congress has additional powers stated in Article III, which is applicable to the federal judiciary, of the US Constitution.

Section 9

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another; nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Section 10

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Section 3

The US Supreme Court ruling that a US president cannot be prosecuted for illegalities or crimes that he or she commits, or may commit, in the course of his/her executing his/her official duties is a wrongful judicial ruling as it contradicts the text of the US Constitution itself and so is subject to review and a trial of impeachment and vacating of that ruling itself by an independent prosecutor, and team, and all-states, interstate-state, collective constitutional-review supreme court, composed of a lottery-chosen justice from each of the state supreme courts, commissioned and convened by the US Congress for impeachment trying of the wrongful SCOTUS judicial ruling violating the text of the US Constitution, in that provision 7 of section 3 of article 1 of the US Constitution in verbatim states:

Section 3: "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. 'Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law'" -- for treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors. This prescription, and its language, of the US Constitution makes clear that all government officials, including the US president, are subject to the laws of the United States of America.

Moreover,

Article II (Characterization, powers and governance jurisdiction of the US president as stated in the US Constitution -- relevant excerpts)

Section 1   Section 2   Section 3   Section 4

Section 1

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:

Section 4

"The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

These akin prescriptions, and their language, of the US Constitution make clear that all government officials, including the US president, are subject to the laws of the United States of America.

To pointedly reiterate, the augmented language of Provision 7 of Section 3 of Article 1 to the language of akin Section 4 of Article II of the US Constitution explicitly states that "...but the Party convicted (the government official impeached for treason, bribery, or high crimes or misdemeanors) shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law" -- federal law, and, as applicable, state/wide or within a state constitutional and statutory law.

Furthermore, after the impeachment trial and the vacating of the wrongful SCOTUS ruling, the US Congress should pass a 2/3rds or larger majority-vote act in both of its houses law stating explicitly that all persons in the United States of America as well as those subject to its jurisdiction are fully subject to all of the laws of the USA. This law should also be added, as soon as possible, in and as an amendment to the US Constitution.

No Supreme Court ruling should be subject to a US Congressional impeachment trial of the ruling itself for vacating the ruling except for if a Supreme Court ruling definitively, in whole or part, contradicts the text of the US Constitution, or contradicts factual, objective reality (such as the SCOTUS ruling that a corporation is a [human] person with the rights of persons, whereas it is not a DNA-biological human person nor even a biological organism in any scientific regard). Reputable tenured, expert professors, whether active or emeritus professors, of language, including those with expertise in linguistics and semantics, analytical and logic-based philosophy and the subject-matter applicable science or sciences should be called by the independent prosecutor, interrogator-juror constitutional-review court of state supreme court justices for constitutional text compliance enforcement and the trial jury of the full membership of the US Senate to present testimony and arguments in the impeachment trials of the prima facie-evidenced unconstitutional or unreality judicial rulings of and by SCOTUS.

For a majority of justices of the US Supreme Court to rule that citizens cannot sue or press felony prosecutable charges against US ICE officers or agents or any federal government personnel or office for violating or depriving them of their US Constitutional rights is the equivalent of nullifying their rights and overriding and overthrowing the US Constitution by artifice of judicial treason, fraudulent authority, [falsely] superior to the US Constitution and its law, that they do not genuinely have.